I could not see this kiosk at all. Where is it?

Hello Wikilux,
I am doing a MapRoulette challge to address rare surface= tag and I see you have used surface=fähbergweg on way/1295055694. Obvioulsy if this is useful it's good to keep it but if it can be replaced by a more common tag it would be tidier.
Thanks
James

Hello gideonr0,
Sorry to bring up a super old changeset. You added way/125736705 Do you remember the source for this, as there are questions over the name.

Hi smeòrach,
I agree Cameron Toll doesn't quite qualify as a neighbourhood, but the junction tag also feels wrong as the roundabout itself is already named Cameron Toll. which makes this node a duplicate. I suggest we go back to place=locality if we feel the name applies to the roundabout and shopping centre only.

Hi drnoble, Sorry to dig out this super old changeset you added cutting=yes on Strathfillan Road way/302600757 here. Is that correct?
James

This is probably much too late. As this mapper has not modified anything for 12 months, I assume the project is over . CycleStreets.net lists its data source as openstreetmap https://london.cyclestreets.net/about/#credits so it would not be a valid source for adding to OSM.

Vespucci is a tricky beast :D

Hello Jimanderin,
Thanks for your contributions to the map. It's really nice to see small details added to a community area. There are really any rules about mapping, but there are some 'guidelines' are kept in a wiki. One of these guidelines is 'name is the name only' osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only. I think some of the items you have added might contain additional information in the name tag. Please read this page and bear it in mind as you continue mapping.

James

Hi Mike, You seeem to have drawn a line on the map but not added any tags. for things to be visible on the map they need to have tags. What were you adding here?
James

Hi Chris, Is this a shoe shop called 'office' that is not the chain store 'office'?

Also way/1074488659. Disconnected ways are not very useful as they can't be used for routing

Hello AyushS183,
In this changeset you have added way/1074488662 where there is no connection to other paths, is this accurate to how it is on the ground?

Cool, I'll leave it in place and maybe have another wander of once the foliage dies back. Thanks

Hello Eyelet99, I was in the Eildon hills today and could not find this path you added. way/1021258966/history I don't suppose you remember how went trod it was when you walked it? It's all bracken now, so it might be much more visible in the winter. wondering whether to remove it or keep it mapped.

Hello Locator, in this change set you added a few bollards with lights in this park /way/197710795. You've used the direction key with value of 360. From my understanding, this indicates all the lights point north, is this what you intended?
James

Hello ftdx1200,
Thanks for your contribution to the map. Looks like maybe you were just testing things out. I'm guessing this house is not called GM0IQI. I'm going to remove it. Please change this back if I am wrong. James

Hi Arno, Thanks for your updates to the map. Looks like there's lots of detail to be added in the area. If you want to find out more about mapping, you can find some guides here osm.wiki/Contribute_map_data. Feeld free to send me a question directly if you have any.

Hey Dmithry, I see you left a fixme on way/962675106. If you are looking for someone local to check something, a note might be more effective than a fixme. Notes are picked up by apps like StreetComplete and are more likely to be spotted by locals who watch for new notes. I'm not local so can't check. I initially thought your fixme was asking for someone to review your edits for tagging correctness, rather than ground truth.

Hi Phodkin,
Did you add the Fixme note on way/961152837 ? It looks like a normal playground from the aerial imagery

Good to know you are aware. I picked a few up, feels like a freebie to get my number of mapped buildings up :D So I certainly don't mind