Dang it: I forgot to close the changeset before moving south!

I am sadly not satisfied that a double white line means it is illegal to cross them under circumstances. Which rule of the highway code in Greece says it is illegal to turn left on a double white line?

Mapillary imagery does not suggest any signage that suggest it is illegal to turn left from the EO77, nor it is illegal to turn left to the EO77. I think you are confusing these restrictions with no overtaking: there is a tag for no overtaking restrictions.

A few redundant u-turn relations (with the same "start" and "end" way) were also removed.

Accidentally hit the "C" key while working on it.

Please, stop adding roads that do not exist: we cannot accept roads where construction has not even started yet. If you continue to add non-existent roads, we may have to consider moderator action, that is, if anyone really pays attention to the damage that fantasy roads can cause to our reputation.

I have decided to remove the street cleaning cycle data.

This is because this type of data was very trivial, and the data could easily go out of date for various reasons, such as demand: furthermore, street cleaning cycles are very hard to verify, unlike bus routes.

This changeset failed, because of a bug in Potlatch.

There is a possibility that I may have to change or remove the road maintenance relation and its members as I see fit to comply with whatever tagging standard I can find. Please see: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/unusual-tagging-in-saint-martin/8650/4?u=ika-chan

CORRECTION: that was meant to be scrubland. 🤦🏻‍♀️

We are quite confused by this changeset because while I assume it must to be part of the scheduled street cleaning routines, the members of the relation are not roads.

Kindly please explain at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/unusual-tagging-in-saint-martin/8650. Thank you.

In way/131879306, I wish to know why did you delete the street lighting data? We use the lit=* to indicate if the path or road is lit at night: Greece does not have the best safety record as far as I know.

I don't know what is the source for the junction numbers of Amvrakia Odos, other than Wikipedia.

Shaky proof? Although Sentinel Playground is not suitable for mapping on OSM, they are very recent enough for a different purpose of uncovering fictitious edits. If those bypasses were real, Sentinel Playground would have shown it right now, and that would then be a cue to begin verifying the alignment with on-the-ground surveys or compatible imagery, such as Maxar Premium Imagery or Bing.

I am confident that way/1102121440 does not reflect reality, according to Maxar Premium Imagery: they are usually recent.

Hopefully, Maxar will provide imagery showing the points where the contraflow transition points.

In node/360097490/history, you removed names in other languages: while we certainly can determine how we implement int_name=* and name=*, I think the use of names in other languages such as Hungarian and French are more of a responsibility of the respective language mappers, who may know more about how they name places in their languages.

Route Master relations are supposed to only contain relations as members, and not nodes or ways. See: osm.wiki/Public_transport#Route_Master_relations

Okay, I fixed the relations. Here is how routes work: osm.wiki/Public_transport#Service_routes - one object (stop_position) per stop to the route relations.

Can you wait a bit while I try and recover the relations? I tried to do it and I keep getting an edit conflict.