Source is also Bing too.

Sorry, I meant https://en.osm.town/@pietervdvn/112928272482062515 .

Thanks, I've managed to find the reply chain at https://en.osm.town/@pietervdvn/112928272482062515with that link, and the outcome at the time was to mark it as disused. I originally restored the node because user "maurobe57" did not provide a reasonable reply, so I assumed it is still disused.

Partially undone (buoy restored): changeset/175461804

Oh sorry, I missed the forum message! My workflow seems to be out of order today.

Hello, the 1963 decree states that the southern end of the EO5 starts in Rio. I think this is still the case because the ferry still runs for traffic not allowed on the bridge.

I wish to ask what motivated you to cut the southern end of the EO5 back to Antirrio. I think ferries can be part of a national road (since it was the only route between Rio and Antirrio before the bridge opened), but I am open to alternatives to ref=* on the ferry route.

The feature you added is actually a cutline, not an abandoned road.

First, I am a woman, but you can also call me a squid in reference to Squid Girl, which my avatar comes from. Two, what is the source for an ancient road passing through this area? I am not sure how well Roman Roads are mapped in Greece, and we can't just use any source on the internet.

You seem to be going back to repeating similar edits like https://osmcha.org/changesets/173003434, mapping roads that do not exist any more (in this changeset's case, way/1454229825, way/1454229831 and way/1454229826. We don't map roads that have been demolished. Why are you doing this?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175209718

What is the source for those proposed roads?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175199069

This changeset was reverted for adding a filter road that is not marked according to Esri, and a service road that's blocked off by guard rails. Why are you adding things that do not exist?

changeset/175200997

service=* are not supposed to be used on the main railway tracks. They are used for yards, crossovers and sidings only.

The uncertainty over the alignment is being discussed at: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/greek-route-numbers/135698/17

I'd say erosion.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175040564

According to https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1447198752648207, there is no filter road at way/1451023071. And you are leaving vague changeset comments as well.

Panio, the EO38 does have a short branch at Agrinio, so that the road can connect with the EO5. Both the EO5 and EO38 used pass through the heart of the city at 38.624765, 21.409455, but bypasses and pedestrianisation changed where exactly the roads connected each other.

Hello, although this is an old changeset, I wish to note that removing translated names can attract concerns by other mappers because we are an international map project and we allow translated names. We cannot control how other language speakers call any place in the world). In addition, you should not be using Google as a source: not only it is copyrighted, but they may not know a place's name in other languages. The reasons are why I had to revert the changeset at changeset/168798169.

Sorry, I must have slipped up with Esri due to tiredness. I fixed that under changeset/174468252

Undone in changeset/174274003. Please consult the community at https://community.openstreetmap.org/ first.

The driveways do exist according to Esri World Imagery. I thought access=private would be enough to block navigator apps from those roads.

changeset/174216960