I do not know why the A1 between Chalastra and Gefyra should be a motorway_link, when it is clearly a major road to N. Macedonia? In fact, I would leave it as trunk until the motorway signs actually appear.

OSRM shouldn't be doing that: I have written to them at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/2021-April/001968.html.

I would like to draw your attention to https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=72572, where we believe that adding "access=yes" to all trunk roads is redundant in the British Isles.

For controlled access trunk roads, use "motorroad=yes", or the combinations "bicycle=no", "foot=no"; "horse=no".

You've basically added addr:country=GR to everything over a great number of changesets, even when there are no other tags. What is going on?

Fixed: made it into a deep ford.

You need to be careful not to just merge ways: there are lots of ways with lighting data and those without, and most editors do not give warning about merging ways with lighting data and no lighting data.

I am very concerned about how you are tagging toll roads in Greece. A toll road does not simply end at the toll booth, but instead at the point where the first toll-free slip road merges. Also, you have not responded to any of my past changeset comments, as well as others: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=9221753

Dang it, that was meant to be Maxar Premium. I think RapID struggles when the browser is open for a long time.

We aim for a good level of detail in street lighting: for example, we count https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/oUn68QziQEfFwQxK-Etw-w as a gap where we use lit=no. Noticeable gaps such as https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/K-C8E-kA6cWAD_F_l1YQPQ can catch some drivers off-guard.

On further inspection, the mess-up with the junctions must be another example of Map-Finder's careless editing: changeset/82815831 – I have posted a changeset comment on the subject and the user has not answered it yet: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=9221753

I'm sorry for slipping up on the junction part.

I am not happy about this changeset: you removed quite valid right-turn lanes and u-turn restrictions, and at least one crossroad no longer exists and is now just a "right-in right-out" junction.

Please, do not delete turn restrictions: they exist not only to prevent vehicles from making dangerous or illegal turns (the central reservation is very thin), but also ensure that the road planners use the correct exit.

Hello, please answer my concerns at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=812013#p812013: I feel that Provincial Roads should not be tertiary because we then cannot use tertiary for other roads to towns, villages or hamlets, without causing serious confusion.

I'm sorry, I must have slipped up with copying the name, probably due to the confusion with editors going for different localisation tags. Is there anything that I can fix for you?

Hello, I believe that you have damaged valid data in this changeset, and I had to partially undo it to protect the data.

Firstly, you split the carriageway where there is no physical separation. We have the lanes:forward=* and lanes:backward=* tags for roads separated only by hatched lines.

For example, a two-way road with a hatched section in the middle uses lanes=3, lanes:forward=1, and lanes:backward=1. placement=transition indicates a transition between two layouts.

Secondly, you did not check the street lighting data (lit=yes/no), which is mapped because Greece has a lot of windy roads, which require a lot of careful attention at night.

I think you should use JOSM, because it is capable of detailed editing, and custom stylesheets that show street lighting data and road layouts.

The source was supposed to be Maxar-Premium.

Imagery was supposed to be "Maxar-Premium" - something is wrong with RapiD.

CORRECTION: it appears that "railway=stop" is a valid (but rare in some places) tag referring to the stop position of trains, but I think it has fooled some editors (as well as me) to thinking that it represents a smaller stop.

Also, it doesn't appear in JOSM, so it is easy to think that "public_transport=stop_position" is the only valid tag. If iD supports "railway=stop", then JOSM should do the same. Otherwise neither should support "railway=stop": it is really confusing.

However, the fact remains that removing stop positions is not a good idea, because it is an accepted standard in public transport relations. We have come a very long way in tagging: for example, is_in=* is already on the way out in many countries (since March 2019). :-)

CORRECTION: it appears that "railway=stop" is a valid (but rare in some places) tag referring to the stop position of trains, but I think it has fooled new editors (as well as me) to thinking that it represents a smaller stop. Ouch.

However, removing stop positions is not a good idea, because it is an accepted standard in public transport relations.

This changeset should have not been accepted because it deleted the stop positions of a station relation. AlexTheoto, just click "ignore" if iD insists that you change the stop positions to "railway=stop": they are not correct.

Hello, you have seemed to add a lot of rings with the tag "man_made=pipeline". I wonder what are you trying to represent? Maybe I can find a better tag for that.