Is this section of the 35E service road signposted as not allowing foot/bike traffic? My understanding is that it is allowed in most cases in Texas unless there is a sign specifically prohibiting it (even if it's a terrible idea)

I know that the city of Cedar Park has some caves on their open data portal, but I've never been able to determine if the license of the data is compatible with OSM. Always happy to see another local contributor!

Thanks for your contribution. The roads you added were not connected to the adjacent road network, so I fixed that for you. We also use the expanded suffixes for names ("Trl" should be "Trail").

Happy mapping!

Thanks for adding these! I surveyed some in the Westside preserve area but hadn'tt gotten a chance to find the others that you have added.

You can press "Q" to square corners of buildings.

Thanks for the response. Is this the case for every POI you have added? Are you adding these on behalf of neighbor.com or the host (UDR?)

You might be getting cached tiles still - it only takes a couple of minutes for them to render, but you need to convince your browser to go grab the new ones.

osm.wiki/Browser_cache

It can be a bit hard to see when the grass is high - much easier in the winter. I added it back with tracktype and trail_visibility tags to try to make that clearer.

curious why you deleted that path, it really is there, and I use it regularly!

Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions. shop=storage_rental should go on the area surrounding the property, not each individual building. There's a helpful diagram on the wiki:
shop=storage%20rental

Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions.

This edit looks good, but you drew a small section overlapping the existing cycleway going west - I went ahead and fixed that for you.

Please add the ALPR at the physical location of the camera and not attached to the highway= way.

Welcome to OSM. I have some concerns about these "Neighbor Self Storage" POIs you are adding.

neighbor.com is a marketplace for third parties to rent out their storage units, right? If I walked up to this apartment complex, could I tell that it was also a neighbor.com storage location?

welcome to OSM. You marked the name of this road as "rd". Did you mean to do that?

Please also place the flock camera at the physical location of the camera, not on the street intersection. I have moved it to the location that I think it is based on imagery, but don't know for sure. Please check my work!

Welcome to OSM. You seem to have changed the name of these waterways to the city they are located in. This is not correct. Maybe you can describe what you are trying to do here so we can point you in the right direction?

changeset/168933295

Sure. OSM has a lot of tags - not all of them are applicable to every object. The editor tries to show you the ones that are most relevant for the type of object you have selected, but it doesn't mean that all of them are mandatory.

Regarding names specifically, the name=* tag is only for the actual name of the object in question, not descriptive names like "Flock Ovilla" or similar. This information can be captured in other ways, like the fact that it is contained within the Ovilla administrative boundary: relation/114460 , and that the manufacturer is listed as Flock Safety.

osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Hope this makes things a bit clearer! Happy mapping

Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. The name tag shouldn't be used for descriptive names like "Flock Ovilla" - it's totally fine for objects you add to not have a name.

Thanks for your contribution. description=* is not for marketing text. I went ahead and mapped this whole development - would appreciate it if you take a look and double-check my work :)

Thank you for uploading the mapillary coverage!

I went ahead and fixed this for you.