osm.wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications

If you want to draw buildings, please do NOT trace on aerial imagery.
In the iD editor, you can change the background. For Flanders, use "AIV Flanders GRB". It takes much more time for us to fix a bad building than adding a missing one.

Hello,
The Dutch name in "name" and "name:nl" is different for this monument: way/552399271/history

Do I understand the "name" tag must be fixed accordingly? Or is there something special here?

Yes, but that is not the point. What I mean is that, despite they may all be related to the same relation, creating several dozens changeset with an identical name *is* the problem.

While you are busy with this relation, would you please take some time to *sort* members. A hiking relation is an ordered list of ways, and it seems you are just throwing them randomly in the relation, and there are some gaps too. This makes the relation unusable for apps. I already cared to fix all the parts within Brussels but you may want to take a second look for your area.

Hello,

Thanks for improving "GR 126" hiking route.

Just one comment: we spotted 83 different changeset of yours with the identical text string "GR 126 - Bruxelles", even though changes like here are definitely not about Brussels. This flagged your contributions as being suspicious.

Could you please use more descriptive changeset titles for each change, e.g. "GR 126 across village X" where X changes every time. It makes it easier when other people review the map.

Happy mapping.

You are welcome!

Hello,

Writing "parking à vélo" in the changeset title and adding 15 trees and a waste basket is misleading.

Anyway, thanks for having surveyed the place.

Please check the tags again.

construction=rail + railway=rail should not be used together.

Do I understand you wanted to map the fact that this railway junction is now operational? In that case, remove the construction key entirely.

@ghia: Thanks for the information but I suggest we stop the conversation on this page; this page is the discussion about a changeset concerning a railway line. Discussing changes in the LEZ is off topic.

For the record, I updated the LEZ 13 days after your previous message, data is correct in OSM.

Hello,

Welcome to OSM.

I made some fixes to your changeset.

Hairdresser was added as a single point inside the building, instead of making the whole building a hairdresser.
node/10586892772

Hello,

Thanks for spotting a new restaurant.

If a place changes, just edit the existing node and change the name and type. Do NOT erase and create a new one beside, because you made a destructive edit (erasing a whole housenumber here).
Don’t worry, we fixed it this morning.

Have a nice day.

Hello,

If you edit a cemetery in France and a road in Berlin, it is better to upload your change after changing one object before moving on to the other. This will avoid creating huge bounding boxes covering half of western Europe in the same changeset.

That being said, I am not sure it is a good idea to add English translations to ordinary street names, unless they are official. Incidently, Johannisberger Straße is a long street and is made of 5 different segments in OSM; you only added a translation for one of them, ignoring the 4 others.

Hello,

Thanks for adding POLIS.
Just one detail here: there was already a node with housenumber 98 in the relation.
Adding another node with the same number is okay… but there should be only one housenumber 98 in the associatedStreet relation, then.

Don’t worry, it’s fixed now.

Hello,

It’s nice to add new buildings but drawing building structures from aerial imagery always gives strange shapes. Those might potentially move every year because those pictures are taken at an angle.

If you want to add or arrange buildings, changing the background is recommended. When you are editing in the web editor, hit the Background button and scroll down to "SPW(allonie) PICC numerical imagery". Then you will see the correct shape of buildings. It’s much more reliable to trace on top of that.

Hope this helps.

Hello,

(See our other comments on recent changesets of yours in Brussels.)

Our city has a very complicated structure and many exemptions for different modes. We have spent considerable care in adjusting permissions to reflect the real situation as accurately as possible, through intense surveying. It is very sad to see you adding lots of "oneway=yes" everywhere and breaking routing. It’s fortunate there are some of us patrolling to catch the recent changes to prevent mistakes from staying too long on the map.

May I recommend you to create notes instead of editing the map directly. We will analyse and deal with notes quite promptly. That might be safer for everyone.

Thanks in advance.

Hello,

Sorry but this is wrong. :-(

Authorised vehicles (service vehicles and cyclists) coming from the park may legally turn left.
Your "oneway=yes" unnecessarily breaks routing for them.

I see you are mapping from another part of the world, without local knowledge. I suppose you map based on reports from users; they probably do not provide you with accurate information. (Some people ignore some details, or they only think about cars and ignore how legislation accomodates other kinds of vehicles.)

We fixed the situation here.

Moreover, it is extremely rare that a street will become one-way in Brussels without an exemption for cyclists (we add oneway:bicycle=no).

We appreciate contributions based on real local knowledge or accurate reports by road users. Random edits based on interpretation of (possibly outdated or inaccurate) aerial imagery are likely to be treated as dubious and we might want to revert them.

Hello,

Are those massive data imports allowed by Tesla? Are they documented somewhere on our wiki?

According to their terms of service, information from their website may not be distributed (and this also restricts importing to OSM): https://www.tesla.com/legal/additional-resources#intellectual-property

You work for them, do you? If all this data was obtained from their website, did you get permission to use it?

That being said, adding addr:* tags on charging stations is a bit weird. Especially when street names do not match.
e.g. in Brussels "Boulevard Lambermont" is only the French version of the name.
e.g in Arlon, "Parc d'activitee Economique Weyler II" looks strange and does not match OSM data
e.g. in Hasselt, "Kempische Steenweg" is quite far from the POI
e.g. in Liège, the "addr" tag copying the full address should be removed.
…

Thanks in advance.

Thanks for the update.

Next time you see a business closing down, do not DELETE points from the database, just remove the tags associated with it but leave the point on the map, so that it can be re-used in the future and so that we can follow the history of how a place changes with time.

I restored this one.

This is caring for very non-standard behaviour, because a missing name tag should always default to the main name. Do you know an example of software that has this issue, so that we could report it upstream?