Bonjour,
Nous avons corrigé votre edit.
Pour le "best practice", on met 4 points différents dans le bâtiment avec un seul point par numéro, et pas les adresses sur l’immeuble. Les points sont dans une relation "associatedStreet" qui leur donne tous les autres éléments (code postal, etc.)
J'ai mis une note sur les points de ne pas effacer, car numéros pas encore dans UrbIS.

A notary is not to be tagged as "government" on OSM.

node/4855517022
layer=-1?

I think you mean level=-1, right?

leisure=common seems weird too.
amenity=community_centre + club=scout is more common if you mean a place where scouts can gather.

Please do not force postcodes on addresses. Postcodes, city names or countries are automatically generated.

Your changeset has been reverted.

Those 5 POI seem completely fake, some of them being in the middle of residential blocks.
IMHO the entire changeset should be reverted.

Your changeset has been reverted.

Housenumber 4 already on the map.
way/243246821

The building you changed is a small building structure in the patio.

In StreetComplete, you can go to "Settings > Quest selection and display order"; it might be wiser to turn of the housenumber quest.

Your edit has been reverted.
Housenumber 16 already on the map.
No need to create a duplicate, that would just corrupt data.

Hello,

Some of your edits of the last hours have been tagged as suspicious, I am trying to see what is going on.

This changeset here appears to be incorrect.

There are two recycling containers here: a buried POI for glass bottles and one overground for cooking oil: you changed data on the latter (node/7876455915/history) and replaced cooking oil with glass bottles.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=742434633804363

I’ll have to revert this.

Nice work but a footway with an open end, not connected to anything, trigger errors on the map.

I suppose there is a door there: I suggest connecting the footway to the building and add "entrance=yes" on the node. (Or other values, depending whether it is publicly accessible, entrance=*)

Hello,

I am not quite sure what "a non-excited building" actually means.

Sure, the building structure had incorrect tags (way/113405487/history) but it should have been kept and tagged as building=pedestal, with the statue on top (layer=1). The "building" is in fact the small pedestal under the statue, it has its own reference number in UrbIS and is used for many things, e.g. calculation of built surfaces in the Region. Most statues and busts have such a "building" with them.

I suggest you undelete it (do not create a new one).

Hello,

Thanks and welcome here.

I checked on GRB (official map for Flanders) and you are right, there was a mistake for the name of this street.

A few houses are missing here.
You might be interested to add them if you want.

How to do that: in the editor, you can use the Background button on the right and scroll down to "AIV Flanders GRB". Then you will see a good map of building outlines to start drawing buildings.

For addresses, you can just fill the address "Dennedreef" and the house number 12. No need for more. That would be better than a single point which cannot be used because it mixes all data.

Happy mapping.

Hello,

Thanks for this and welcome to OSM.

Changeset titles are an important part of what we are doing. It helps other mappers see what is going on on the map and why somebody felt he/she had to change something.

May I suggest you fill the title correctly upon uploading, instead of "...".

Thanks in advance and happy mapping.

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Hello,

"11 bus 1" is invalid.
Please use addr:housenumber=11 and addr:unit=1 instead.

On this square, every connection on foot is now impossible. This is because areas are not routable.
way/1090795904

What is the current situation please?
Unless the square is completely barred for works, it seems you might need to add some connectors across the area.

Hello,

I don’t think it is correct to use addr:housename here.

addr:housename means "This POI has no ordinary address (street+nbr) but is found in the building with that name", and the value must match an existing name for a building.

If Toison d’Or is the name of this building, then simply use "name" for it.

("building:name" can also be used for buildings with many other tags, to avoid confusion about what the name refers to; on this building I think that "name" will be enough.)

Hope this helps.

Have you finished your tests? You might want to delete your node now.

Hello,

Thanks for this; I remember we didn’t map it because it was only a—presumably short-lived—test, but it’s been several months now, so it’s likely it will stay and it’s nice to have the new situation on the map.

One concern about this connector:
way/1090723431

Is oneway:bicycle=yes inherited from the previous situation, or is it intentional to have it here?

On Mapillary, it looks like cyclists *and* motor vehicles may legally enter here from the south. Motor vehicles will turn onto Rue du Chapitre/Kapittelstraat.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=689221835501079

That will be oneway=no instead.
I guess you were there recently. Does this match the current situation?

Hello,

Thanks for this.
It might be better to use name="N" instead of name="N Building" for buildings here? It is always better to avoid repeating the object type in the name. And it might have side benefits, e.g. shorter names can be rendered at lower zoom levels.

I think there might be an issue here.
There is an M2 sign that explicitely allows cyclists on the bus lane.
There are two (legal) options for cyclists here: use the bus lane (C3+M2) or use the shared sidewalk with D10 signs.
I had to undo your changeset.
Have a nice day.

Strange name for that bus stop.
Is this a real edit?