Wagamama was already on the map.
You are just creating a duplicate when doing that. Please don’t.

Hello,

highway=construction without construction tags is faulty.

You should add construction=footway or construction=cycleway on the three ways you created here.

Thanks, this helps us improving the map. 😊

changeset/116746654

I can understand that: sometimes the wiki provides contradictory advice because various pages were written by different groups of people and not kept in sync.
Happy mapping.

Hello,

Warning: there is a problem with some tags you are creating these days.

building=train_station is okay on the main station builing.
But please do not add further tags.
Especially not tags like public_transport=station.

When you do this, you are merely creating a duplicate Bruxelles-Midi/Brussel-Zuid railway station in Brussels, and that creates a lot of nonsense on the map, because the station already exists.

I will fix those I can find.
Thanks.

Hello,

Maybe you should have a second look at some objects. The "name" field is only if something has a real name. It looks like this barrier should not have a name. Use the description field if there is something special about it. (But the existing tags are enough.)
node/8303373221

Hello,

Thanks for adding a building.

Do not forget to fill associatedStreet relations when they exist. We use them a lot in Brussels, to group all the houses from the same street (no need to type the same postcode or municipality name on every house, for instance).

Also, you might be interested to name your changesets in a more useful way for everyone, instead of "observations from field and urbis" all the time.

Happy mapping.

I fixed it.

User wrote "réserve naturelle" in her changeset; it looks like she clicked on the wrong preset in iD. Correct tagging is leisure=nature_reserve.

That should be fine now.

This swimming pool is a *private* one, isn’t it?
We should mark it as private. Otherwise it will show up in various apps where people are looking where to go swimming. :-o

Thanks.
I made small changes to your edit because there was some confusion with the building structure and you added some information twice. It should be fine now.

Hello,

About this one:
way/258773459

I guess "IJzerplein" is the correct spelling, right?

Hello,
Thanks for your changes.
The name of imagery you used is automatically generated in the changeset, it is not necessary to type it again.
On the contrary, you can use this field to describe more accurately what you really did on the map.
I see that in this changeset you moved the border between two Belgian provinces: way/155505353
That is something quite significant and probably worth explaining why you felt you had to do this.
Have a nice day.

Hello there,

I agree with @multimob: there have been discussions within the community against stop_area_group relations in the past and our understanding was that it wouldn’t be really useful to maintain.
* osm.wiki/DE:Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_area
* https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg23014.html
* The wiki itself currently recommends against using them.

But I understand the reasons why you want them. I undeleted former stop_area_group relations and made sure all Brussels interchange stations have them. That should be fine now.

Perhaps you might be interested to edit the wiki to clarify why those relations are useful.

Have a nice day.

Fixed by
changeset/116276297 (USA)
and
changeset/116461578 (Belgium)

Hello,

Those invalid "building name" tags were created by a newbie earlier this week.

I am currently trying to fix all the mess that user created, this is why you will see my name in some changesets in this area. I am still waiting for the answer from them before cleaning up all the silly tags they created.

But thanks for spotting it indeed. ;-)

Hello,

I sent you another note about adding shops as single nodes instead of drawing buildings inside existing buildings, like here. This will help you make better edits in the future.

I fixed this one.

Hello,

Thanks for this but I had to undo some of your changes.

If 100% of the building is devoted to being a fast-food, then you add the tags to the building itself.

It looks like the fast-food is only one part of the building, with a private door because some people like upstairs. In that case, simply add a node ("Point") somewhere inside the building and put the tags on that node to say there is a fast-food here and do not change anything to the house. You do not need to type the address because it is automatically calculated from the building around it.

Have a nice day.

Hello,

I had never thought about adding bicycle=no on a station node but it makes sense. :-)

FYI, the reason why boarding with a bicycle is not allowed in this station is in reality because they allow a really limited amount of time for boarding operations due to the number of trains per hour on the same tracks.
The train controller is expected to stay near the middle of the platform—there is a key box on the platform they must use to warn the train driver when it is safe to start—and cannot afford to walk to the far-end of the train to open the door to a cyclist.

Congres and Chapelle/Kapellekerk stations have the same rule.

Hello,

You are editing a forest, but it is already on the map, like this: way/15570071

It is not necessary to create dozens of tree rows within a forest. We sometime add individual trees but only if it has added-value (e.g. inventory with location and species).

Have a nice day.

Hello,

It seems you have uploaded several changes in the last hours, always using the same descriptition title: "CARTO".

This is a map, everything we do here is "carto"-related. :-)

Remember to always describe properly what you changed on the map.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks in advance.