bxl-forever's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 95487626 | almost 5 years ago | @MapMarC9, would you please tell us which software gives you this unexpected result, and for what kind of vehicle (car? bicycle? on foot?). We found no turn restriction in OSM data on this intersection, nor any access restriction or speed difference. There are plenty of routing engines around, but normally they will always favour the shortest or fastest option. If you right-click on the map you can test two routing engines (OSRM and GraphHopper), and they both route along the main boulevard, which is the correct solution. So does OsmAnd (a popular app for mobile phones). |
| 94006769 | about 5 years ago | Hello,
|
| 96002568 | about 5 years ago | Hello, If you do not mind, I would like to give more details about the rules about multilingual names you are referring to. In reality, in Brussels, we use the "fr - nl" standard to fill the name tag for everything that comes from local or regional authorities: places, streets, public administration buildings, bus stops, etc. But this one is a café. In that case we take the name chosen by the owner of the business. The display on the café itself only says "Le Roy d’Espagne". Even on the Dutch-speaking version of their website (https://roydespagne.be/nl/index.php) they do not translate the name of their business (e.g. "Welkom in Le Roy d'Espagne", "Waarom kiezen voor le Roy d'Espagne?"). It seems all name:* tags here are informal translations, one might go as far as remove them altogether (or move to alt_name). I suggest you restore the official name of this café. Have a nice day. |
| 92316180 | about 5 years ago | Hello,
|
| 95901483 | about 5 years ago | Nice first edit. I fixed a few mistakes, though.
|
| 95171747 | about 5 years ago | Hello,
|
| 95449318 | about 5 years ago | Hello,
|
| 95115651 | about 5 years ago | Hello, I saw "review_requested=yes" on your changeset. I would be happy to help you. But I’m afraid the changeset title is incomprehensible. If you would be so kind to explain it a little more, it might be more useful. I saw you moved some buildings. I would like to inform you the local community drew the outline of most building in Brussels very accurately, based on official Urbis numerical imagery provided by the authorities; drawing the outline of a building from aerial photos should be avoided because they are misaligned. |
| 94137221 | about 5 years ago | Hello,
|
| 95089111 | about 5 years ago | "Chemin des Serres": I couldn’t find a data source with it, and couldn’t find a Dutch translation either. I gather you live not far from there, maybe there is a sign somewhere. |
| 95057545 | about 5 years ago | Hello,
|
| 83713225 | about 5 years ago | Hello,
Same for Finland (you added AX, for Åland). Perhaps I am missing something.
|
| 94739019 | about 5 years ago | Hello,
I didn’t mean to offend you about the "outdated map" stuff. It is very common to see other mappers rely on aerial imagery and fail to catch very recent stuff. ;-) Perhaps it would be better to inspect elements one by one. Buses: I kept your idea about drawing the bus track on its own along Gouv. Nens, it is fine. The Nens/Carpentier intersection is probably awkward as it is now. When I surveyed it in September, it was still barred to eastbound traffic (only westbound buses could go there). Logically it should be open now. Since you have local knowledge of that part, feel free to update it. About the pedestrian crossing: I’m not sure to get your point. We’re not discussing the merits of having chosen this spot for the crossing, are we? As for the map, I believe the location is correct, isnt’it? Cycle track: this one? (way/850054837) Is it gone or changed? |
| 94729722 | about 5 years ago | Hello,
|
| 94397886 | about 5 years ago | It makes sense, indeed. Josaphat is different, it has so many car-free roads whereas other parks usually have alleys that are too small for vehicles. In Brussels, SIAMU/DBDMH uses OSM data to route their fire trucks. AFAIK, they route over highway=pedestrian and ignore footways; therefore it might be useful for them. |
| 94524778 | about 5 years ago | Hello,
|
| 94655483 | about 5 years ago | Hello,
For benches, a suggested extra is the "backrest" tag (yes/no). A possible use case is someone writing an app where you can find a suitable bench. Not essential, only if you feel like providing it. For bollards, do not bother with the `Allowed access' box in the iD simple editor.
|
| 94655592 | about 5 years ago | Sorry to break in again but this change is not the right way of doing.
|
| 94638078 | about 5 years ago | Hello,
|
| 94397886 | about 5 years ago | (typo) with so many "roads" in it. |