Reverted.

entrance tags on a POI are ambiguous, they have 2 doors. We assumed Treurenberg 4
node/2485390707

Reverted.

entrance tags are ambiguous, we assumed you mean the main entrance on nbr 62
node/4582611917

Reverted

Reverted

Reverted

Reverted

Reverted

Reverted

Reverted

Reverted

Reverted

Reverted

Reverted

Reverted

Reverted

Reverted

Reverted

This changeset is a detructive edit caused by a faulty tool named OnWheels.

You removed several valid tags here:

addr:unit=1
contact:[email protected]
contact:fax=+32 2 513 44 52
contact:phone=+32 2 383 06 40
contact:website=https://www.swecobelgium.be
full_name=Sweco Belgium nv - Sweco Belgium SA
full_name:fr=Sweco Belgium SA
full_name:nl=Sweco Belgium nv

It looks like account is massively dumping data onto OSM and removing data on dozens of POI in our city. Please stop with faulty edits immediately, you are destroying months of valuable work.

If you are part of the organized OnWheels mapping activity, please report this message to your supervisor immediately. They are aware of the problem with their software and know that it should *not* be used in production.

Thanks for the link. I think all the streets now have the correct maxspeed value and associated tags. People who use OSM data will now get the correct speed limits.

Hello,

This road used to be drawn as two separate parts, because the cycle infrastructure differs.
way/29059314
In this changeset you merged them into a single road, with "shared_lane" attributes. This does not seem to match the latest aerial imagery, where I still see a normal painted lane.
Has the situation changed here very recently or is this a mistake?