Merci mais ne pas ajouter les adresses sur les magasins, les adresses sont déjà sur la carte.

Hello,

Thanks for this but I wonder about this node:
node/11487030963

ref=Poste 36 kV Pêcherie
Is this a valid tag for a ref? Description, probably.

OK, I’ll fix it.

Hello,

AFAIK, there is no legal restriction against cycling here (southbound road)
way/31428753
Sure, it is for the mighty, and a careful cyclist will prefer to use the service road next to the bus depot, but I don’t think a restriction is a appropriate.

The opposite direction should not be taken as an example because the northbound road has a D10 sign on the sidewalk, which legally forbids to cycle on the road. There is no such sign on the southbound road.

Hello,

associatedStreet relations are a special type of relation used to create a logical connection between addresses and named roads. Please do not tamper with them. In particular, please do not add sidewalks into those relations.

Have a nice day.

Hello,

Why did you change the "network" tag for TEC route 84 from TECX into TECL?

(relation/15828348 + its 2 child-relations)

I believe this is incorrect. TEC’s public transport network is split into 5 operating entities, with proper codes, and TECX is for Namur-Luxembourg area (TECL is only for routes in Liège area and they are coded differently). Maybe you would be so kind as to explain the reason for this change.

Thanks in advance.

Hello,

Thanks for this. I have reviewed and fixed some of your latest edits.

Can I please suggest to turn on the "Prefer contact prefix" option in the settings of the Every Door app. This will ensure that when you add a phone number to a POI, it gets the modern tagging convention.

Don’t worry, I’ve already fixed this one.

Hello,
It looks like you managed to upload this changeset on midnight (GMT), making it the very first change in 2024 in the database. Congrats!

Hello,

There is already a Lebanese restaurant in this building.
node/9713094717

In your edit, you added NYYÓ as if it was a second restaurant in the same house. This would be very surprising. I suppose you wanted to replace the existing object instead of creating a new one.

I can fix it but could you please tell us what you saw here?

Hello,

I guess someone may have told you already but please never trace on aerial imagery for buildings or walls between properties. We have to redo all your edits and it takes much more time cleaning someone else’s mistakes than to do it right the first time. :-(

In the Brussels-Capital Region, please use UrbisAdm (URBIS numerical imagery).

Thanks in advance.

Hello,

I don’t understand your edit.

There is a "site relation" in OSM which already stores information about artist, dimension and more
relation/14727703

In your edit, you added the same information on one single element of that fountain. Duplicating information in a database is something we strive to avoid.

Could you please explain what was the intention here. We’d like to clean this up.

Do they? They are named after the former place that no longer exists.

Perhaps it would be more appropriate to rename the Wikidata and Commons entries, then we can link to them again. Or, if what is required is to show a picture of the building (regardless of the café currently operating it), perhaps just the image tag might be appropriate.

Bonjour,

Merci pour les ajouts. Question : quelle est la source de données pour ces arbres ? C'est un import de base de données de quelque part ou un travail 100 % sur vos propres relevés ? Ou juste un travail sur les photos aériennes ?

Hello,

Do those streams have to be written entirely in lower case? Anything special about those names?

Hello, and congrats for a nice first edit on OpenStreetMap with a very clear description.

Hello,

Next time, would you please be so kind and upload changes like this in smaller blocks.

Adding 27 objects at once on various places all over the Netherlands generate a fairly large bounding box spanning over several cities in the Ruhr area in Germany as well as about 1/4 of Belgium. This is unnecessarily annoying for mappers in other regions.

(On an unrelated note: it is unlikely you surveyed those 27 locations yourself, it looks like you are probably importing an existing government dataset here (osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines).

Don’t worry, we fixed it.
Making it an ordinary road is the most appropriate option here.

Hello,

Thanks for "better reflecting the reality". Indeed, this area of the map seems to have changed in recent years and not many people were actively updating the map.

Here are two suggestions to improve your edits.

1) Try to make smaller/more specialised uploads. For instance, work on a single road, or a couple of buildings, and then upload that. And only then, start working on another part. This will make it much easier for your fellow mappers when reviewing changes in an area, especially if you can provide clear descriptions of what/why you changed something.

2) I see you redrew some buildings, like this one: way/29418761
Maybe nobody told you but buildings are never traced on (distorted) aerial imagery… because those images are updated every year and if you compare images from different years, roads don’t move but taller structures such as buildings shift a bit, depending on the location of the plane when the picture was taken.
To solve this, we use numerical imagery, which works out of the box in most editors.
I see you are using the online editor, so it works like this: hit the Background button on the right and scroll down to "Digitaal Vlaanderen GRB", which has the proper outline of all buildings in the Flemish Region. Trace buildings on top of this.

Happy mapping.

Hello,

Pardon my curiosity but those are very strange tags.
"motor_vehicle=designated" on a path is understood as having a footpath which has been specifically built to accomodate all kinds motor vehicles (in particular cars), and where they are legally allowed to drive.

Here is a picture of the
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=512548510086792
It looks like a forest path, and it seems to be completely unsuitable for motor vehicles.

Could you please tell us what kind of "modification circulation" went on here exactly?

(Maybe you wanted to edit only one part of the road, as it seems that larger vehicles may reach the southern part near the houses, and not the entire path across the woods.)

Yes, stating that Donahue's Pizza has been taken over by Main Street Pizza is a good example and that would make it clear that the change was intended.

We were confused by the "why doesent google maps believe me" title, because OSM and Google Maps do not share the same data: anything you change in OSM will *not* be shown in GMaps, and we never copy data from GMaps into OSM, but I suppose you are aware of that.