OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
128608748 about 3 years ago

Hello,

bpost is the operator.
The quest was about the name, which is not the same.
I fixed it.

128603420 about 3 years ago

Hello,

AFAIK, though one part of Van Volsem is a one-way street, cyclists may legally use it in both directions.

You added "oneway=yes" but provided no additional tags such as "oneway:bicycle=no".

Do you know if the signs from this picture taken in March 2022 are still there?
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=158143509923577

128600438 about 3 years ago

Hello,

I see you requested a review.

This change seems to be good.
Indeed, it is better to create single points for shops when 100% of the building is not the shop.
Good work, well done!

128593255 about 3 years ago

I don’t think this is a good idea to remove trailing slashes from URL just for the sake of it.

Adding / at the end of a domain name is standard practice on OSM.
website=*

(Honestly, I think it doesn’t make any difference, as most clients will correctly parse addresses with or without the trailing slash. No need to undo this one. 😉)

128545628 about 3 years ago

Hello,

Thanks for spotting this.
I had to undo your change to preserve the history—we’d better change the tags into shop=vacant or disused:shop=* instead of erasing objects from the database.

osm.wiki/Keep_the_history

128391568 about 3 years ago

Perfect, thanks.

128488916 about 3 years ago

Hello,

Thanks for this and welcome to OSM.

I did some fixes, to make sure this point will be visible on the map (some important tags were missing).

128459423 about 3 years ago

Hello,

The change for NATO seems legit: i.e. you added a translation into Macedonian.

But would you please write useful changeset comments when you are editing. It looks like all your recent changesets are named with some obscure codes, and in your latest edits you are sequentially numbering them instead of writing some information about what to expect there.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

128436432 about 3 years ago

I’ll revert it.

128443223 about 3 years ago

Hello,

Why did you make it a primary road? Was this discussed beforehand?

Thanks in advance.

128436432 about 3 years ago

Hello,

Welcome to OSM.

This edit looks a bit strange to me, especially claiming a park is public while keeping "access=private" on it.

I don’t think this "park" is open to the public. It looks very much like the private garden associated with the large apartment building here. There does not seem to be a way to enter it, as it has a hedge all around it (picture taken a few months ago).
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=151609070579970

It cannot be accessed from the back either.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=323428053223053

Did something change here recently?

128437622 about 3 years ago

Hello,

I think this underpass has been discussed multiple times. It is being rebuilt, right?

Because you have just removed the whole way—and its entire history—from the database and replaced it with an invalid highway=construction way across the road. I guess it goes underneath, doesn’t it?

What is the situation exactly? What kind of cycle infrastructure is being built here?

Thanks in advance.

128394556 about 3 years ago

Hello,

Thanks for this but there might be two issues here:

opening hours = Mo, Tu, Th, Fr 2:00-14:00, → I presume they open at 12:00, not 02:00, right?

phone number syntax: +32 2, not +322 please.

128391568 about 3 years ago

Hello,

This seems to be a large building.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=349916436964450

Is number 24 solely used by "De Harmonie" or is this number also used for other uses (e.g. residents, or other small offices). In the latter case, it’s better to create a separate node for the community centre instead of taking the existing one.

What did you see when you were there?

128367406 about 3 years ago

Hello,

The link seems to point to the wikidata entry of the street itself.

name:etymology:wikidata should point to the person.

128320529 about 3 years ago

¡Hola!
Todos estamos "mejorando el mapa". Todo el tiempo.
Por favor lea esta página para ver cómo escribir comentarios útiles. 😉
osm.wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios

128250976 about 3 years ago

Hello,

To answer your question: It is not allowed to take data from charge.brussels to put it onto OpenStreetMap. That’s the reason why we couldn’t import those. (Otherwise, we would have done it.)

Their licence terms explicitely prohibit it: people can read the website but may not re-use data.
https://www.charge.brussels/en/legalpage

There are lots of websites around with copyrighted data, it’s really sad. But on the other hand, surveying stuff is generally more reliable than those datasets.

Have a nice day.

128245419 about 3 years ago

Hello,

Wouldn’t it be better to set access=private instead of this pile of cascading tags?

This way has highway=footway → by default, it is only for pedestrians and no-one else. (And incidently, it will not matter much, because it is only connected on one end.)

access=private disallows everyone but foot=designated overrides it (it means foot=yes).

bicycle=private+motor_vehicle=private are there to say the same thing for the third time (highway=footway disallows cyclists; access=private disallows non-resident cyclists).

You are probably not responsible for previous edits but since you had a look, it’s always a good thing to take the opportunity to clean up a little. And if you are not familiar with access tags, perhaps this helps a little.

highway=footway+access=private is probably more than enough in such a case.

Have a nice day.

128235874 about 3 years ago

Fine, thanks.

128235874 about 3 years ago

Hello,

Pardon my curiosity but what is the Σ sign supposed to mean here?
cuisine=belgian;∑

(Incidently, "Belgian" restaurants in Belgium are usually tagged as cuisine=regional.)