bxl-forever's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 128608748 | about 3 years ago | Hello, bpost is the operator.
|
| 128603420 | about 3 years ago | Hello, AFAIK, though one part of Van Volsem is a one-way street, cyclists may legally use it in both directions. You added "oneway=yes" but provided no additional tags such as "oneway:bicycle=no". Do you know if the signs from this picture taken in March 2022 are still there?
|
| 128600438 | about 3 years ago | Hello, I see you requested a review. This change seems to be good.
|
| 128593255 | about 3 years ago | I don’t think this is a good idea to remove trailing slashes from URL just for the sake of it. Adding / at the end of a domain name is standard practice on OSM.
(Honestly, I think it doesn’t make any difference, as most clients will correctly parse addresses with or without the trailing slash. No need to undo this one. 😉) |
| 128545628 | about 3 years ago | Hello, Thanks for spotting this.
|
| 128391568 | about 3 years ago | Perfect, thanks. |
| 128488916 | about 3 years ago | Hello, Thanks for this and welcome to OSM. I did some fixes, to make sure this point will be visible on the map (some important tags were missing). |
| 128459423 | about 3 years ago | Hello, The change for NATO seems legit: i.e. you added a translation into Macedonian. But would you please write useful changeset comments when you are editing. It looks like all your recent changesets are named with some obscure codes, and in your latest edits you are sequentially numbering them instead of writing some information about what to expect there.
|
| 128436432 | about 3 years ago | I’ll revert it. |
| 128443223 | about 3 years ago | Hello, Why did you make it a primary road? Was this discussed beforehand? Thanks in advance. |
| 128436432 | about 3 years ago | Hello, Welcome to OSM. This edit looks a bit strange to me, especially claiming a park is public while keeping "access=private" on it. I don’t think this "park" is open to the public. It looks very much like the private garden associated with the large apartment building here. There does not seem to be a way to enter it, as it has a hedge all around it (picture taken a few months ago).
It cannot be accessed from the back either.
Did something change here recently? |
| 128437622 | about 3 years ago | Hello, I think this underpass has been discussed multiple times. It is being rebuilt, right? Because you have just removed the whole way—and its entire history—from the database and replaced it with an invalid highway=construction way across the road. I guess it goes underneath, doesn’t it? What is the situation exactly? What kind of cycle infrastructure is being built here? Thanks in advance. |
| 128394556 | about 3 years ago | Hello, Thanks for this but there might be two issues here: opening hours = Mo, Tu, Th, Fr 2:00-14:00, → I presume they open at 12:00, not 02:00, right? phone number syntax: +32 2, not +322 please. |
| 128391568 | about 3 years ago | Hello, This seems to be a large building.
Is number 24 solely used by "De Harmonie" or is this number also used for other uses (e.g. residents, or other small offices). In the latter case, it’s better to create a separate node for the community centre instead of taking the existing one. What did you see when you were there? |
| 128367406 | about 3 years ago | Hello, The link seems to point to the wikidata entry of the street itself. name:etymology:wikidata should point to the person. |
| 128320529 | about 3 years ago | ¡Hola!
|
| 128250976 | about 3 years ago | Hello, To answer your question: It is not allowed to take data from charge.brussels to put it onto OpenStreetMap. That’s the reason why we couldn’t import those. (Otherwise, we would have done it.) Their licence terms explicitely prohibit it: people can read the website but may not re-use data.
There are lots of websites around with copyrighted data, it’s really sad. But on the other hand, surveying stuff is generally more reliable than those datasets. Have a nice day. |
| 128245419 | about 3 years ago | Hello, Wouldn’t it be better to set access=private instead of this pile of cascading tags? This way has highway=footway → by default, it is only for pedestrians and no-one else. (And incidently, it will not matter much, because it is only connected on one end.) access=private disallows everyone but foot=designated overrides it (it means foot=yes). bicycle=private+motor_vehicle=private are there to say the same thing for the third time (highway=footway disallows cyclists; access=private disallows non-resident cyclists). You are probably not responsible for previous edits but since you had a look, it’s always a good thing to take the opportunity to clean up a little. And if you are not familiar with access tags, perhaps this helps a little. highway=footway+access=private is probably more than enough in such a case. Have a nice day. |
| 128235874 | about 3 years ago | Fine, thanks. |
| 128235874 | about 3 years ago | Hello, Pardon my curiosity but what is the Σ sign supposed to mean here?
(Incidently, "Belgian" restaurants in Belgium are usually tagged as cuisine=regional.) |