Thanks, but "bas relief" only exists in French, I think you need to put this tag instead: artwork_type=relief

Hello,

Out of curiosity, what are the names of those routing apps that are unable to handle stairs? So that we can report the issue to their devs, that will save time and effort instead of adding extra tags on thousands of places.

In the meantime I fixed your edit: bicycle=dismount on stairs and footway connectors between the stairs and the cycleway should work fine.

Have a nice day.

Hello, 0xc4,

You were the fastest to upload the map, congrats.

Just one thing: when you add "oneway=yes" to a street, the restriction automatically applies to every mode of transport… and also cyclists. This breaks cycle routing.
I added "oneway:bicycle=no" which is what we do when cyclists are legally allowed to use a one-way street in both directions.

Happy mapping.

Hello,

StreetComplete has an undo button in the lower corner of the screen.
osm.wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#I_made_a_mistake._What_do_I_do?

Alternatively, you can leave a note on the map explaining there was mistake and giving the correct answer. Notes are public, another mapper will probably see it and fix it promptly. Or, when you are logged on OSM’s website you can edit it directly in the browser.

Have a nice day.

Hello,

I had a look at your recent edits.

I disagree with your edit here: the kerb has been slightly lowered to reduce the height of the step to the road.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=160478879722375

It would have been more appropriate to use the "A bit higher than road surface"-option in StreetComplete. As a matter of fact, most kerbs in the Brussels Region are in this configuration.

The "High curb" option is only if they made absolutely _no_ effort to lower the kerb; it happens sometimes (5 to 10% of cases).

Hope this helps.

Hello,

It’s nice that you spotted this was actually one single building.

If you want, next time you’d better leave a note and we’ll take care of this. Merging buildings is not something you can do in the iD online editor; I had to revert your changeset because it corrupted data here by creating a malformed multipolygon.

Happy mapping.

Hello,

On this mapillary picture, there were M2 signs.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=544570850627336

I guess from your edit that those have been removed. No access anymore for cyclists towards Porte de Hal/Hallepoort, then, it that correct?

Hello,

Thanks for updating shops and other places.

Maybe two pieces of advice here, I hope this will help you make better contributions.

1) If a place is gone, do NOT destroy the point. Because then we will lose history—we sometimes use this, for instance to see all the shops that were there through the last years. If a place is gone, the best way is to put "shop=vacant" in the tags and remove the tags associated with the previous shop.

In this example, since you found that Loving Hut is gone and has already been replaced by Fonske, I think it would have been better to re-use the same point and just change the tags on it.

2) If a shop is located inside a building that only has one address, you don’t have to fill the address tags on the shop too; it works perfectly fine without them. People who look for a shop will see the address in the search results anyway, it is generated automatically. That is a great time-saver and it makes the database lighter.

Happy mapping.

Also this: osm.wiki/Relations_are_not_categories

OK, you can disregard the "building inside building" part, sorry to have bothered you for this issue. The MP flagged a warning, and I tried to compare two copies of the database to investigate the issue. I found the problem now and it's something else.

But I’d like to hear your opinion about the stables and if you think we should do something to it. Thanks in advance.

Have a nice day.

Hello,

You might want to have a second look at this part:
way/997936762

This is now a building inside a building, because it is contained in the outer shape of the multipolygon. The OSM data model disallows this. It should either be left out of the MP or tagged as building:part. You can decide which option you feel most appropriate here.

For the Royal Stables, I remember drawing the former multipolygon; the current release of UrbisAdm shows this building as a plain shape now. I think UrbIS may be mistaken because the centre of the building is a large patio, covered by a glass roof (way/400967180/history). Here is a picture that shows what it looks like on the inside: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ecuries_royales_de_Bruxelles_-_03.JPG

Hello,

Just wondering: Why access=permissive on this building?

Is it because of BELvue museum, which is located in a part of what is technically the same building structure? Otherwise, it is definitely not a place that can be accessed. (In case they have "opendeurdagen" every now and then, it wouldn’t probably count for OSM.)

Have a nice day.

Perfect! Happy mapping!

I don’t think there is a full-scale bus station in a tiny pedestrian street in central Paris. And if such an important amenity does exist, it is very unlikely no-one else would have thought to add it to the map.

The wine shop in the middle of a country road in Russia looks very strange too. If a shop really exists there, it is probably a duplicate of this one: node/7999574785

Is this a test edit?

Hello,

Thanks for this.
The change is technically correct, you split the road properly.

But just to be sure: can you please confirm you surveyed it in person?
Several changes announced on the official map published by city authorities have not been implemented (yet) on Aug. 16, so we always must be careful and check with our own eyes.
Thanks in advance.

On the main osm.org website, the "History" button on top of the screen shows the latest changes in any given area.

Each changeset is shown with its own bounding box. The bounding box is defined by the two modified objects that are the farthest apart. As you can see, this change covers the whole of Brussels, and also Leuven, and showed up in our data feeds, despite no data was modified in those areas.

That’s exactly what you describe in the first part of your reply. If you can upload all your changes after you’re finished in one area, that will be just perfect.

Of course, we’ve seen much worse than that—some mappers do one small change in Brasil and one in Moscow and that will cover half of the planet and annoy much more people.

Happy mapping.

Thanks for having surveyed other parts of this street.

Just one thing again: commenting another mapper’s changeset flags the changeset as being wrong. Only do this if there are mistakes. There are no mistakes in this changeset. ;-)

Hello,
Pressing the "paste" button in JOSM on the wrong moment, indeed.
Thanks for spotting this, it’s fixed.

Tip of the day: upload your changes more frequently, certainly before travelling for one part of the country to another. This will avoid creating huge bounding boxes like this one, which is annoying for all of us reviewing changes in Belgium.

Hello,

This change has been reverted for this POI: way/30415879

Please ignore Osmose warnings about languages. There are multiple rules for languages in Belgium, e.g. Federal government offices (trilingual), Community government offices (mololingual), EU (English), international institutions, embassies… which do not follow the basic rule for street names.