For clarity, I suggest we continue the discussion under the original changeset of yours, not here.
changeset/119995779

Hello,
I fixed a mistake in this changeset: the pedestrian area you drew was incorrectly connecting a subway platform 3 floors below.

Looks fine to me.
I just changed a cycle crossing because you applied presets for pedestrians, otherwise it is fine.
way/1053473702

I did some minor fixes based on latest aerial imagery.

But, if you’ve been there and surveyed the place, it’s better that you update the map yourself, according to what you saw.

If you are in doubt, do not hesitate to ask, I can always help.

Hello,

Thanks for checking and for the Mapillary pictures. I took some time to reply because I discussed it with a fellow mapper who lives nearby and seized the opportunity to have a look.
That’s good work. I did a minor change to make sure we preserve bicycle navigation, and it should be fine now.

Happy mapping.

It looks like you use the presets in the iD editor and selected traffic signal whereas this node (node/2503031003) is in reality a pedestrian crossing.

Hello,

This is contradictory:
uncontrolled;traffic_signals

"uncontrolled" means "there are no traffic signals", i.e. an ordinary crossing where pedestrians may cross at any time.

"traffic_signals" means the opposite.

Can you please check again.

Hello,
Thanks for this.
If you want to draw missing buildings in Brussels, please connect to the UrbisAdm layer, which also gives the proper house numbers. We *never* trace buildings on top of aerial imagery, this is recipe for disaster.
Don’t worry, I fixed this one.
Have a nice day.

Thank for this. Indeed, it seems to be the real name, despite the "clickbait" impression it gives.
Well, we’ll keep it, and I’ll add a note on the POI stating it’s not a mistake: that might deter other mappers from ruthlessly deleting it.

Hello,

Your changeset is very disturbing. First, because it covers a very large part of the country, and second because the changeset title says very little about what/why you changed objects.

In particular: Why did you relocate Oxfam shop in Brussels? AFAIK they are still located on housenumber 137, and their website says so.
https://oxfammagasinsdumonde.be/magasins/bruxelles-bourse/

That would help us see if this is some new information which you personally surveyed, or perhaps a mistake.

Thanks in advance.

Hello,

Are you sure this is the real name for this place?

With such a name, it won’t take a long time before people would delete this, on suspicion of abusing the map for self-promotion.

Hello,

Unless the situation has changed since the picture was taken (2 months ago), there is a cycle lane in one direction and only logos on the other direction, and not what you entered.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=139594545190476

Are you sure?

Hello,

It’s a good idea to push the Upload button in StreetComplete at the end of your survey. Do that before you move to another area.

Otherwise, your changes from the first survey are still stored on the phone and uploaded together with changes taken in your other survey, a few hundred kilometers away.

Cheers.

Seems like bicycle=yes is missing on way/510192807
Correct?

Otherwise, we can divert ICR/GFR routes along the normal road.

Hello,

Do you know the name of that restaurant you’ve just added to the map?

There is a new bar here, which was surveyed and recently added; I want to make sure you didn't create a duplicate.

Thanks.

(Sorry, not meant to be a comment on this changeset, this was the reply to a note.)

Added, thanks
node/9672650541

Hello,

Great to see you again!

De Lijn 683 route relation is broken.
Fixing it is tricky because there are many service roads and private roads here and I don’t know where this route goes exactly.
relation/1638281

Maybe you want to have a look.
Have a nice day.

Hello,

You made the Atomium a museum as its primary function!

This goes against the principle of least surprise.

When people think about the Atomium, they rarely think about it first about being a museum. This is a tourist attraction, a landmark, a monument… and then also a museum.

To solve this, perhaps that it would be wiser to create a POI inside the building, and put the museum tags onto it. And restore the former tags on the main structure. What do you think?

Hello,
Belgieplein or Belgiëplein?