OpenStreetMap
bxl-forever's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 164922599 | 9 months ago | Hello @NguyenChuong. Can we please request that you type correct description when you push data into the OSM database. We saw a large number of edits by you, which you titled "Changes" or "Add". This is not a correct way to describe your actions. Especially not saying that you "add" things when you massively delete buildings like in this changeset. (I do not object against erasing old buildings, but please describe correctly what to expect with your changes.)
Thanks in advance, and happy mapping! |
| 165006032 | 9 months ago | Hello, It looks like you added another bag shop with the same name a few days earlier: node/12751721901 Either there really are two RSVP Paris facing each other, or one of them should be removed. Can you please review your edits and fix the map accordingly. |
| 165975098 | 9 months ago | Hello,
|
| 165947242 | 9 months ago | Thanks for the reply. The primary reason not to repeat the same information is that OSM is a geographical database. Doing so guarantees better data consistency. This is particularly true in a place like Brussels with multilingual street names. I understand that some people would prefer that every POI contained all the information, to obtain everything with a single query. Most reverse geocoders automatically understand address inheritance, for instance Nominatim, which will automatically obtain the address of the container building (way/228248709) but also post code areas, nearest city node, country, etc. Have a nice day. |
| 165947242 | 9 months ago | Thanks for updating the shop type. But please do not add addr:* tags to shops and amenities. We are working hard to keep a clean addressing system in Belgium, and having duplicate addresses is not wanted. Happy mapping. |
| 165948049 | 9 months ago | Hello, I inspected the outline of several buildings you traced with source=microsoft/BuildingFootprints and they seem to be significantly different from the Digitaal Vlaanderen GRB basemap, which shows the official outline. Wouldn’t it be better to trace directly from GRB? What do you think? |
| 165955749 | 9 months ago | Thanks for adding the place. But please do not add address tags when you add objects to the map. All the addresses in Brussels are already on the map. If you type an address on an object, it will become an address point on its own and that will introduce a duplicate. We fixed it. |
| 165959084 | 9 months ago | Hello, If you want to edit locations in two different countries, please upload them as separate changesets. Never upload them at the same time. Doing so creates a gigantic bounding box covering most of Europe. Nobody likes that.
Also, please make sure to provide an adequate description of what you changed on the map. Not just the name of a city. For instance, something like this (which is what this changeset contains) "Add a playground in Pemberton Gardens, London" "Add 2 table tennis tables in Whittington Park" "Remove an industrial area in Pakrac" "Add some new buildings in Pakrac" |
| 165884101 | 9 months ago | OK, sorry if the first message was too short and not easy to understand.
I restored a situation which looks correct now. Thanks. |
| 165884101 | 9 months ago | relation/19092343 is an invalid multipolygon + you created a pitch inside another pitch. This makes the map even worse, because we have bad objects now. Please redo. |
| 165848880 | 9 months ago | Press Club Brussels Europe has been on the map for 8 years.
Please do not trust what Organic Maps is telling you: this app only shows *some* objects from the database, and not all. I removed the duplicate object you created today. |
| 165809558 | 9 months ago | Hello, Please do not mark as prohibited to pedestrians without considering whether footways have been mapped
This edit breaks pedestrian navigation in this area entirely, because navigation engines have no way to route a pedestrian here. I will repair this edit. |
| 165752857 | 9 months ago | Hello "Did I do that", and welcome to OSM. You discovered that StreetComplete is a nice app to keep information up to date. However, please make sure to only insert correct data in OSM. If people do careless mapping, our data can quickly get corrupted and become unreliable. In this edit, you were asked to confirm the items collected by the Oliobox container. Those are orange containers that take cooking oil. I see that you ticked the answers that it accepts cooking oil and glass bottles.
This is not correct. The glass container run by Bruxelles-Propret/Net Brussel is another object in OSM: node/1200215697 I will undo your edit and restore correct data on the map. |
| 165710775 | 9 months ago | Bonjour. Cette édition crée beaucoup de problèmes. Il faut arrêter de jouer avec les lignes de bus dans l’éditeur iD. Je pense que vous n'avez pas compris comment faire cela correctement. Ce changeset a rendu invalide 35 relations sur les 36 modifiées.
Prenons un exemple pour bien vous expliquer "Bus 15/: Mons SNCB → Casteau Dépôt"
Est-ce vous comprenez que ce n’est pas correct ? L’arrêt Mons SNCB doit être placé au début de la liste, pas à la fin. SVP tenir compte des remarques qui vous sont faites, car cette erreur vous a déjà été signalée régulièrement.
Merci. |
| 165668019 | 9 months ago | Much better now, thanks. In case you want to edit more opening hours of objects, there is a nice tool to test them before uploading, here:
|
| 165668019 | 9 months ago | Hello and welcome to OSM. The opening hours on https://stores.delhaize.be/fr/delhaize-flagey do not match with what you added to the database. 08:00-13:00 on Wednesdays whereas your edit restricts it to Mondays. Was this a test edit? |
| 163577143 | 9 months ago | Right, thanks. |
| 163577143 | 9 months ago | Hello, May I enquire why you removed this tag? In case you hadn’t heard of it, panoramax is a legitimate tag, this is a federate imagery platform (see panoramax=*) The value you erased was
Here is how to transform it into a link and see the picture.
If you don’t mind, I will restore this tag. |
| 165550638 | 9 months ago | Hello, I had a look after your comment. There is no need to split a building solely because there are many addresses. As far as I can see, this looks like one single structure. The inventory of buildings gave it one single ref number in UrbIS (8726367), so it should be all right as it is. Just one thing for addresses. * The best way to map is to have single points for addresses (one address = one point). If you know the accurate location of doors, this is even better, then you can snap the point to the edge of the building, exactly where the entrance door is located.
We made all the fixes here. |
| 165545582 | 9 months ago | Hello, Thanks for spotting the new buildings here. Indeed, they were missing. Something you probably do not know, as a new user: aerial imagery is only there for objects on the ground. Taller objects like buildings are always distorted on aerial imagery, this is why we never use aerial pictures to trace buildings. You will find the correct outlines in UrbIS numerical imagery. Don’t worry, I fixed the shapes of those 4 buildings. |