Merci pour les vérifications mais… pour rappel, sur OSM on n’écrit pas les codes postaux et le nom de la commune directement sur l’adresse.

Uniquement nom de la rue + numéro de maison. Le reste est entièrement automatisé.

Hello qqqq-anonym,

Adding missing shops is nice, but please do not retag buildings themselves.

To add a shop, the recommended method is to create a floating point inside the building, while leaving the building untouched.

I fixed your edit, there is nothing more to do here.

Just for clarity, this is not a mistake on this changeset, but merely information that 2 years later this POI has moved.

Thanks for this information, I updated the map.

If you delete it, it might be re-imported by mistake by any random mapper believing there is a building missing here. That would create nonsense, this is why we keep it, with the official ref code, but put a "lifecycle prefix" (razed:*) on it so that this is clear the building isn’t there anymore, it won’t be shown on the public map and that would prevent people from believing there is something missing here.

We retag it as long as UrbIS refers it like this. In a few weeks or months, they will release a new version, with the new building—with a different reference number—and that way we’ll be able to draw it.

Happy mapping.

Pour votre info :

Tommy3009 a de nouveau cassé toutes les relations de bus. Cet edit a demandé une grande réparation.
changeset/162993031

Hello.

Please retag buildings if they are still on the UrbIS layers, instead of erasing them from the database.

We repaired your edit here:
way/260902780

Pour info, les bâtiments ne doivent jamais être tracés depuis les photos aériennes (ce sont des images avec une forte distorsion).

Pour tracer des bâtiments, en Wallonie il faut toujours utiliser le fond SPW(allonie) PICC numerical imagery. Merci.

Hello, and welcome to OSM

A 2.5 m² wood is very unlikely.
way/1363061451

What is this changeset about?

If this is a "test", please undo all your edits immediately. No testing in the production database, please.

The 404 error has been fixed in a subsequent changeset.

As for the supermarket vs. convenience choice, this is a borderline case again. We settled it some time ago, having all the Proxy Delhaize tagged as supermarmets (on the ground that in general those shops are large enough to potentially push a trolley there) whereas Shop & Go would have shop=convenience.

SVP ne pas ajouter les adresses manuellement sur les magasins. Toutes les adresses sont déjà renseignées sur la carte, ne pas toucher.

Hello.

Changing "highway=service" into "highway=busway" is a sensitive issue, since access permissions must be arranged differently. In our city, bus lanes come under various forms, each having its specific set of exemptions or legal access.

This massive change of several roads should preferably have discussed with the local community beforehand.

It went under the radar because it was hidden under an innocuous changeset title, about the MapRoulette task for roundabouts.

I will try to fix those edits.

It will depend on the search engine. If you mean the small search box on osm.org, that is a simplified version of Nominatim and it won’t get you very far.
It is a general weakness of reverse geocoders; most of them will return the nearest street. There is usually a misunderstanding: raw OSM data is there a geographical database, not as a business directory.
I know that some people are developing this kind of bridge, to use relations that group objects together, so that it might be easier to get the exact address of any point on the map. No idea when this will be available to all, sadly.
Have a nice day.

Merci. On corrige. node/12549287656

OK, nous allons corriger les adresses et nettoyer les erreurs.

With respect, I disagree with the view that the revised layout is correctly calibrated. Look at the bottom part of this image, this is how it looks now after this change.
https://i.imgur.com/makYKhr.jpeg

Please observe: there is no such thing as "satellite" pictures for mapping in Belgium. We rely on aerial pictures from UrbIS or numerical imagery, which gives official shapes of many items.

Don’t bother, I’ll try to fix it in the next days, or will ask someone to do it.

Hello,

It looks like you didn’t calibrate the geographical data before importing from the Infrabel open data feed.

Do they use Lambert coordinates or some other reference system?

While some useful stuff was added, this edit also moved tracks far from their real location, which is clearly visible on the latest aerioal imagery. I am afraid we’ll have to repair your edits once more.

Les adresses des maisons ont déjà changé officiellement ?
way/223280816

Hello.

I saw you wanted a review.

The overall layout of the pavement along Dries is correct… however there was an issue with the way crossings were drawn in the intersection.

Crossings get different tags. We use "footway=sidewalk" for pavements and "footway=crossing" for the crossings. And the ways should be split on the "kerb" node itself.

Fixed here:
way/1362343360

Hello.

The address is already on the container building, therefore inheritance will work out of the box here.
way/80434317

Why do you want to duplicate the same information on the shop?

Hello.

Could you please look more carefully next time. A few years ago, we obtained a change in the app, which now shows you the operator of each device when asking the question.

One container (two underground bins, it seems) is run by Bruxelles Propreté - Net Brussels, this one only accepts glass.

One container is run by Oliobox. This is an orange plastic container, which only accepts cooking oil.

You should make sure to answer the question for the device being asked. It looks like this changeset added incorrect values, with glass and cooking oil being answered for both devices, which is obviously incorrect.

We fixed your edit.