Please do not delete nodes. Keeping the history of objects is a founding principle of OSM.
Remove tags and set it as vacant instead.

Bonjour et bienvenue.

Merci pour votre contribution.
Attention, OpenStreetMap est une carte utilisée par de nombreuses personnes, il faut toujours mettre du soin à y insérer des données correctes.

Nous avons changé votre contribution parce qu'il y avait deux problèmes majeurs.

1) Vous avez mis qu'elle était à sens unique pour tout le monde. Ce n’est pas exact, il y a des panneaux « excepté vélo » et ceci fait aussi partie de la donnée de la carte. Si on oublie cela, le routing vélo est cassé et ça donne des suggestions d’itinéraire pas correctes.

2) Vous avez mis toute la rue à sens unique. Ce n’est pas exact, la partie avec le tram est encore à double sens pour tout le trafic. Comme la rue était dessinée en un seul morceau, la solution est de la couper en deux au point de la jonction de Rue de Lombardie et uniquement mettre une partie à sens unique, pas toute la rue.

Nous comprenons que c'est difficile à faire quand on débute. Vos contributions sont bienvenues, et si vous sentez que la technique est difficile, alors peut-être de préférence ajouter une note sur la carte en décrivant ce qu'il faut changer, et nous serons heureux de le faire et d’expliquer.

Nous avons tout corrigé ici, ne plus faire svp.

Happy mapping!

Thanks for adding more data to the map but please never erase valid addresses anymore. In your changeset, you stole an existing address point to create the association and erased the address. As a consequence, number 5 disappeared entirely from searches, preventing anyone from looking for this address in the future. Your edit was flagged for possible vandalism.

I restored a correct situation, i.e. keep a separate node with the address, and create a separate node beside with the tags about the association.

Have a nice day.

Everything has been fixed, don’t worry. :-)

Hello,

Thanks for this but we had to re-do your edit.

Let me explain: the quest is not about how many stands there are but how many bicycles can be parked here. Each U-stand can accomodate 2 bicycles. Therefore, if you spot a range of 5 stands, the correct answer is 10.

Don’t worry, we already fixed this one. Hope this will help you for future edits.

Happy mapping!

All those large "buildings" in Pakistan which you added do not seem to be buildings, they look more like residential areas, e.g.
way/1218385857

Hello,

Thanks for the effort.
Warning: this pic4review app seems to corrupt OSM data when dealing with stops that are ways or areas (i.e. all tram stops in Brussels). I don’t know how it works but it retagged ordinary shelters and made fake bus stops out of them. I had to revert this, and I transferred the mapillary tag with the image to the correct platform.

Example here of the damage:
way/306595329/history

Reverted by changeset/143010309

Thanks for this and good luck with the new shop.

Since the place will only open in two months, I set the opening hours to off, to avoid misleading people into thinking they can find an open Kruidvat here. I put a reminder to myself to update that in the week before the opening.

A few months ago I enquired if you still need to repeat the addresses of your shops on their nodes. We are in the process of eliminating duplicate addresses on many places all over Brussels, and Kruidvat+ICI PARIS XL shops are an unfotunate exception.
Did you make any progress in the way you use OSM so that we can finally remove addr:* tags from them?

Thanks in advance.

Hello,

I am not sure we are talking about the same thing here.

You changed the highway type from "tertiary" to "residential". The highway type is just a way to show some streets more or less prominently on the map. The only condition is that highways of the same type connect properly, and unfortunately you broke the continuity here.

This is not the same as access tags, i.e. setting who is allowed to use a street. There is a special way to tag this and it has nothing to do with the highway type.

Can you please explain what you meant by "Residents only". Are you suggesting there is an access restriction on this street?

Thanks in advance.

Beste,
Het is fijn dat je helpt met bushaltes. Kan ik u een of twee dingen leren?

Als de naam zoiets bevat als "perron 8", dan is de publieke naam ("name") van de halte de korte vorm: "Diksmuide Station". En dan voegen we de technische naam toe als "name:De_Lijn=Diksmuide Station perron 8".

De referentiecodes van De Lijn worden altijd opgeslagen als "ref:De_Lijn". Negeer het "ref" tekstvak volledig en typ de code altijd in de tag lijst onderaan.

Groeten.

Don’t forget to add proper tags to it → tourism=gallery in this case.

+ The street name does not match. "Rue" starts with an upper letter.

+ Can you please review the location of this gallery. It looks like you attached it to the middle of the road, whereas it should probably be inside a building.

Bonjour.
Je suppose que votre intention est que votre point soit visible et trouvable. Donc il ne faut pas oublier de mettre surtout le bon tag pour dire à la carte ce que c'est.
Il faut ajouter : office=it
osm.wiki/Tag%3Aoffice%3Dit

Hello,

Thanks for this and welcome to OSM.

Here is some advice that I hope will help you make better contributions.

In this changeset, you added a point to the map with an address and a description text. It’s nice but nothing will be shown on the map. The description you added is nice but this tag is only for humans, the data renderer will not use it. To make it appear on the map, you need to add a special tag that tells exactly what it is.

It looks like the most appropriate tag to add here is "shop=laundry (shop=laundry).

To do this in the online editor, find the point you created, click on it, and you will see a list named "Tags". Hit the "+" button at the end of this list, type shop in the left box and laundry in the right box.

Another suggestion too: shops and amenities are almost always located inside buildings. I see that this point has been created outside of the building, I guess you want to move it inside.

Once you upload your changes, it usually takes a few minutes before they get visible on the main map.

Happy mapping!

I know you have good intentions but this is not a correct way to add things to the map.

Do not put a French-only name as the name tag and then a Dutch translation into "operator", that makes no sense. Both CPAS and OCMW are part of the main name.

Don’t worry, we fixed it.

Hello,

Sorry but I had to revert this changeset because it (really) broke too many things. It is a complicated intersection and when you pushed or cut roads it broke bus routes continuity and cycle relations too.

As an alternative to the issue we talked about earlier this week, a quick workaround can be to add a small connector to cut the corner without going to the centre of the intersection. This might be a small improvement.
way/1217185327

My first idea was to draw the two directions of the road as separate roads, but it will probably make the main intersection even messier. I fear there is no good solution here…

Hello,

Nice driveways. Next time, make sure that roads are only connected to other roads and never to boundaries. You inadvertently snapped two driveways to the official border between Flanders and Brussels, changing the respective size of both territories.
Don’t worry, it’s already fixed. ;-)

Hello,

If you draw the cycle track on its own, please make sure to remove the "cycleway" tag on the main road to avoid double definition, e.g. here: way/151340187/history

Also, if you want to create shared foot- and cycleways, at the very minimum please make sure to add the segregated tag (segregated=yes means that cyclists and pedestrians have their own space (D9 sign) whereas segregated=no means they both share the same space (for instance if there is the D10 sign)).
way/1217076307

Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM.

Voici déjà quelques commentaires pour améliorer les contributions sur la carte et éviter les erreurs communes.

1. Les tags pour un commerce sont mis sur le bâtiment uniquement si commerce occupe 100 % de l’espace (p.ex. un supermarché qui a son propre bâtiment). Beaucoup de commerces de ville sont dans des maisons avec des habitants aux étages : en ce cas il est mieux de créer un simple point pour le commerce, sans toucher au bâtiment.

2. Ne pas répéter les adresses sur les commerces quand ils sont déjà mis sur le bâtiment ou sur la porte. Par exemple, il y a déjà une entrée 39 ici (node/1485653435) → ne pas écrire la même chose sur le commerce.

3. Numéros de téléphone au format international ISO → +32 2… et pas 02…

Happy mapping, have a nice day!

Dear user @Bruno1460,

This is a kind reminder to ask you to please stop editing cycle relations in Brussels.

You are mechanically changing the names of all of them to impose your personal naming scheme. There is a discussion on the OSM.be Matrix channel and you started editing shortly after launching your proposal without waiting for a consensus about how to name them properly. (Spoiler: definitely not with such names that break all language validation rules.) There are also other tags to fix on the cycle network and we’d rather group all changes at once. Finally, the iD editor is not suited for such a task, you will probably miss some relations or corrupt them if you select them manually in the online editor.

Why was it so urgent to change the whole network today *before* leaving time for fellow mappers to react?