It looks like you've duplicated every fairway (and maybe other features) on this golf course. For example: way/703510295 and way/907234897 are the same polygon. There should only be one polygon. Could you go back through and clean up your dupes? Thanks.

Hi there Chris, I'm trying to clean up all the golf courses and I see you are making "less-than-ideal" edits that I eventually come around to and spend a lot of time "fixing". I'm not saying they are outright errors, but if I could get you to do them in a different way, it would save a lot of headaches.

Take way/1211821702 for example. You are marking the boundary of the bunker with two polygons in order to not map the center rough(?) island. What should really be done is to first map the rough outline, then the bunker, and then select both areas (shift click) and then combine them in a "multipolygon" relationship by pressing the "C" shortcut in iD. The same style of mapping should be applied to fairways that span multiple holes. If they butt up against each other, they should be drawn as one large boundary and then "combine" them with the "inner" features like tees, greens, bunkers, water hazards, etc.

If you could do this going forward, that would be immensely helpful to me in my clean-up. If you have any questions, feel free to reach out. Thanks.

Depends on what is meant by "North". If it is in Lane County, then yes, I'll get around to it at some point. I usually remember as our monthly dinner meetup approaches.

Great. Good to know. Thanks Chris. I just figured it would be unusual for someone to replace a pool with a putting green, so I wanted to make sure it wasn't someone armchair mapping without knowing what is currently on the ground and picking the wrong sat imagery. (And yes, comments/replies on changesets generate email notifications.)

Do you know this course personally? I find it hard to believe they would tear out a pool to put in a putting green. The Bing imagery shows construction of what would become the pool. Can you please go back and correct this? (way/1185318810)

Hi there. OpenStreetMap is not the place to draw in course routes for temporary events. Sidewalks already exist and you're adding duplicate information which shouldn't be done. I'll be deleting this community walk wherever I see it.

There are other tools for drawing your own map for private use. Try looking up umap.

Thanks.

The name of this road (way/1123750989) isn't really "Road Closed", right? I was going to delete the tag or change it to something more appropriate, but I wanted to check with you first.

Hi there, can you look over your edits over the past few days and make sure you don't have the boundaries of identical areas overlapping with other boundaries of the same type? I see a lot of natrual=woods that look like polygon Venn diagrams. They should be combined into single areas where appropriate. Thanks.

While I commiserate with the dilemma of reverting objects that have been further changed, I just don't know how your request can reasonably honored. How exactly am I suppose to know about every possible data error that I shouldn't be making "minor" fixes to? Is there a list somewhere? Your request is chilling and makes me think I should never make another edit to the map lest it might make a future revert difficult.

Something very bad happened to the Eastern edge of way/14624247. Can you take another look and address as appropriate? thanks.

Sidewalks on 126?! Bwahahaha. Thanks for helping out @archpdx.

Hi Alan, thanks for contributing to golf course mapping. When you have to map around bunkers or islands within bunkers like in way/1107615818, you should draw them as separate entities, and not draw across and around them and back out in what I refer to as "lollipop" mapping. The inner ways should be rough/fairway/whatever and they can be combined/joined with the enclosing way to form a multipolygon. If you need help with doing this, please feel free to reach out.

Why do these duplicate (and slightly shift) the existing waterway that has been there for 8+ years? Shouldn't they be deleted??

Did you check your work after you ran this "simplification"? It left 100+ tiny little ways that had nothing to do with reality. I'd suggest avoiding this time of change in the future until you understand what it leaves you with.

Same deal here: way/903888461. The way crosses over itself and makes an invalid polygon.

Looks like something bad happened to way/875016206. Was this intended?

FYI, I reverted this changeset as the changes made introduced dozens of consistency errors when you moved parts of objects but left behind many nodes that were shared with other objects, creating ways that zigzagged and created invalid areas. If objects don't align with the imagery you are using, it doesn't been they are wrong. Your changeset comments gave no information about why you thought your imagery was more up to date.

In addition to deleting stuff that shouldn't be, your changeset comment of "1" is not enough for a quality change comment to inform others what you are doing. It needs to do a better job of explaining the "why" of a change.

Hello Shafter CA,

The landuse=residential tag isn't meant for single parcels, but entire neighborhoods. See landuse=residential for the following line: "The landuse tag is mostly used for larger areas and not at parcel granularity". You might want to re-edit those that you've created. At the very least, please consider not using parcel-level landuse tags in the future. Thx.

Why are you doing this? Please stop. There is nothing wrong with my edit. If you feel there is, please discuss it instead of reverting my work.