Thanks for the fix. Sorry for the misplaced accusation.

Why did way/704190233 get rotated and jumbled up?

Hi Eric, you might want to take another look at this adjustment that you made. Old Pactolus Road doesn't match sat imagery and has pulled nodes that are shared with another way (903993154) in such a way that it is no longer a valid path.

Pipes that cross over each other and do not connect (no 4 way junction physically in the pipe) should NOT share nodes between them. Please fix this.

2000 boxes is the limit, which I’m guessing you know. If someone wants to make an improvement by adding some nodes, they can’t. My change enables others to easily make improvements.

way/879100852 is an irregular shape. Can you take another look and correct it? Thanks.

A 45km dirt bridge seems rather unlikely. Can you clarify what this trail really is and adjust tags as necessary? Thanks.

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-96.50673&lat=36.25733&zoom=4&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=long_ways%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Which node should be on top?

Since you are using a tiny node on a physical object that has non-trivial width and length, maybe it would be okay to separate them a few inches. The nodes would still represent the location of the objects correctly and would keep the Q/A tools from alarming. I don't think putting them on different layers or levels would quiet the tool, but I haven't explored that in depth.

What are these spokes within the "arc reactor"? way/1083262397

There are some OSM Q/A tools that don't like it when two nodes share the same exact lat/long coordinates. One case of that was pointed out recently with node/9926139654 being one of the nodes. Is it possible to separate these two nodes by some minute distance? Thanks.

I have reverted the change and made the fix that I intended to make. Looking at it anew, there are problems that you might want to look to rectify. The farmland extends oddly to a point in the northwest corner (node/9916211431). This doesn't match satellite imagery (not to mention that nobody would want to manipulate a tractor into a tight area like that. Conversely, the wooded area looks to extend farther east and should probably be reflected as such. I don't know much about forest=wood usage, but to use it for a thin line of trees probably isn't the best use. But like I said, I'm no expert in the use of that tag.

The thing that was wrong with it that brought it to my attention was that the two eastern nodes of the way were reused by the way, such that the way had a piece that was zero width. Looks like the way was inadvertently deleted when I went to correct that error.

You are able to continue with the way however after you fix up your nodes. And JOSM should be warning you of the validation errors before you submit the changeset, so you are able to fix the issue at that point. If you need help, feel free to reach out.

Please make sure that houses with 90 degree angles are drawn with 90 degree angles. iD has tools that will square up your area if you right click on the area.

I use OSM Inspector from Geofabrik: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi. I know that KeepRight has a similar feature, but doesn't update as frequently as Geofabrik's QA tools. KeepRight is at https://www.keepright.at.

The list of all affected ways:
way/1066238220
way/779579382
way/1063014746
way/1038312894
way/1058936463
way/1071383335
way/779579392
way/1071379773

What's up Doc?

Can you take another look at the changes you made recently. Several ways around way/779579382 were edited in such a way that it looks like some shared nodes were moved and that drastically changed the shape of some areas that are obviously unintended.

way/1077274315 and several other forest areas that are drawn here are oddly shaped, don't match satellite imagery and overlap with other forest areas. Was there some accidental movement of nodes? Could you take another look and make sure it represents what is on the ground? Thanks.