aharvey's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 88130654 | over 5 years ago | Agreed, if you're happy to revert this that sounds good to me. If you could just post back here if it get's done? |
| 88175524 | over 5 years ago | hi, the fixme here is asking to check which kind of sport is played here sport=* |
| 88175619 | over 5 years ago | hi in this case the name applies to the whole aquatic center and not just the pool so it should go on way/172942441 the other tags are good! |
| 88176490 | over 5 years ago | hi the building for this already exists at way/335696957/history so I've moved your added building tags to the existing building |
| 76213250 | over 5 years ago | looks good |
| 88176606 | over 5 years ago | I've moved this tag to the way with tourism=hotel |
| 88176665 | over 5 years ago | I've rolled this one back in changeset/88198083 to retain the name on the main building footprint way to avoid duplication. |
| 88176704 | over 5 years ago | I rolled this back in changeset/88198008 to avoid the duplication in names |
| 88176704 | over 5 years ago | hi these buildings are already named on the footprint way eg way/423824984 I don't think this needs to be duplicate to all the parts. |
| 88187781 | over 5 years ago | looks good |
| 88190521 | over 5 years ago | There are two styles of doing traffic lights in OSM, 1. is place the tags on the intersection 2. is place the tags at the stopping position (for each road). Looking at the change at https://osmcha.org/changesets/88190521 this now looses the pedestrian crossings which were mapped before, so probably the best way to model this one is a single highway=traffic_signals where the ways intersect and then where the 4 existing nodes were have highway=crossing + crossing=traffic_signals. |
| 88190638 | over 5 years ago | FYI I moved node/7727922877/history from on the bridge to underneath, pretty sure this is on the ground level not on the bridge https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/5-KSydn8Uy2RgITqge3BFA |
| 88190926 | over 5 years ago | Hi, the tourism=viewpoint tag is for scenic lookouts, it looks like the footway is already mapped here so I've reverted this change. |
| 88130654 | over 5 years ago | Hi was this mass edit discussed somewhere first? |
| 87950019 | over 5 years ago | Agreed with what ortho_is_hot said, the crossing would only be bicycle=designated if there is a bicycle light usually next to the walking/stop man light. |
| 87761558 | over 5 years ago | ps opening_date=* is only for future dates, now that it's open it should be start_date=* per the wiki. |
| 87396727 | over 5 years ago | no worries, trust you with the local knowledge then. It was only back in my uni days that I did the occasional lap around here. |
| 87396727 | over 5 years ago | okay if you know what's on the ground, I thought that they closed off all these roads to cars because of all the extra cyclists out during covid. |
| 87396727 | over 5 years ago | but if these are no longer open to motor vehicle traffic, we should at least add motor_vehicle=private. |
| 87370508 | over 5 years ago | Hi Russell, that makes sense. Certainly I'm not saying you're wrong, I guess this was just different to how I'd seen it mapped in other places and how I'd interpreted the wiki. But after reading that thread I can understand where you're coming from. So happy to leave it like this then, but interested in hearing what others think and seeing more examples of how other places map. |