hi how come the buildings were deleted here? There was important information like that it's terrace buildings, the building architecture and number of levels.

hi did you mean to delete the track name here?

I've reverted these changes due to reasoning discussed here.

Hi a service building per building=service " represents building specially designed to contain constantly working machinery like pumps, transformers or measuring equipment. Usually such building is not supposed for people being inside while machinery works normally."

So building=commercial is a better fit for a vet where people work inside so I've changed this back.

Yeah it's the one on the concrete ramp I was talking about, but with it gone then you're right it's open!

must have only happened in the last few days then on the 24th of July there was still a barrier https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/NX3nPJVRLcH_eWl_F0qaqQ

*phones

unfortunately it doesn't seem like photos have enough accuracy as an inertial navigation system, otherwise this would be much easier.

Hi, Just looking to understand what's going on here, for example way/407224855/history is access=yes but bicycle=no and motor_vehicle=no, so who can access the road if not bicycles or cars? The same goes for other George Street sections you edited in this changeset https://osmcha.org/changesets/87895112/.
I've been keeping an eye on these roads since the light rail opened waiting for them to open but they just seem to have an orange barrier still there that the construction crew must have forgotten to take away!

Hi PJ, it's best to only add in a maxspeed from either a sign or road markings, otherwise best to discuss any other changes first.

Hi, welcome to OSM. A shopping centre mapped as an area is a more accurate representation what actually exists on the ground compared to a single node, so I've reverted this change.

I think it's okay to move the center tags to a multipolygon building relation, but to a single point looses information.

I did some more reading and found this tag came from the proposal at osm.wiki/Proposed_features/gross_weight, where the maxgcweightrating:goods tag is documented as "the prohibition applies only if the permissible maximum mass of the vehicle or combination of vehicles exceeds that figure." with further comments that "Does not apply to buses or other vehicle types except goods vehicles.". however according to https://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/roads/safety-rules/road-rules/heavy-vehicles/index.html these light traffic roads signs mean "If weight restriction sign is displayed for a road, you must not use that road if the total weight of your vehicle, including its load, is the same as or heavier than the weight shown on the sign." so it never say it only applies to goods vehicles, and it means the total weight of the vehicle including load which is what maxweight means. So I'm not sure this new tag is needed or that simply using maxweight here is incorrect.

That's okay, they are different things, one is the name of the wharf itself man_made=pier, the other is the name of the public transport stop amenity=ferry_terminal, so they can both co-exists like how you've mapped it.

Hi there is no physical separation for way/803219832 so it should be tagged as part of the road instead of as a separate way. Since way/172750202 is already tagged to say there is a counterflow cyclelane here, I'll delete the way you added.

I'll update these to bicycle=yes since bicycles are permitted here due to the lack of any bicycle=no signage and bicycles permitted on any road unless signed otherwise.

Hey mate, verifiability is an important concept for OSM as documented at osm.wiki/Verifiability. Part of this means that subjective opinions are best not mapped and instead we stick to objective truths we can verify on the ground. bicycle=stupid sound quite subjective and it's going to work out better to tag things like maxspeed, shoulder, lanes etc which bicycle routers can use to assess routes for different types of cyclists. I'

wow big changeset, but looks great!

Hi could you explain the reasoning for changing the maxweight tag? The one you've changed it to I couldn't find any documentation for and I think the standard maxweight=* tag is correct here. From my understanding this is a general weight restriction hence Key:maxweight.

I could still see the traffic lights at https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=mF63TVvIODK5s81GCEBfBg&lat=-33.86163055555556&lng=151.2105472222222&z=17&x=0.6745173514626654&y=0.5276029931131762&zoom=0.024237851712115975 but that imagery is old and they could be in the process of removing them. I'll revert the change but leave in a fixme note for it to be checked (not urgent).

Great work finding out what these were!

I think you left in the traffic_signals tag by accident in https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/7728291989 and https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/7728291990 so I've fixed that up now.