Snad sa to podarilo:
changeset/159589842

Dakujem, len skoda, ze su vsetky tie priepusty (tunnel) s chybnym tagom 'level' namiesto 'layer'. Skusim to poopravovat po Slovensku.

OK, ale aj z videa je zrejme, ze oddelena cyklocesta konci pri ihrisku Nova doba a nejde az po Bajkalsku. Davajte pozor.

Pardon, ten aj tak mate, myslel som ten druhy node/12256298431 . Ale je fakt ze su trochu odlisne v realite.

Nie su obrubniky ako
node/12256298430 skor kerb=flush?

This building has 6 levels, in the OSM model. Ground floor counts as 1 too.

Zdravim, nezabudnite uvadzat zdroje dat a tiez zmysluplnejsi popis sad zmien. "POI update" nikomu nepomoze.

Thanks, but please provide proper changeset description, as documented at osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments .
Also please do not edit in such large area in one changeset unless the changes somehow relate together. Which the do not relate in case of random minor edits.

Suhlasim, ze zrejme aj pred Vasou zmenou to bolo hrozne. Mnohe budovy so source=kapor2 (z katastra, ale z roku 2010) su tiez zle, avsak z dnesneho katastra su dobre, velmi dobre suhlasia na Ortofoto. Narozdiel od toho, Inspire su na 90% zle, posunute, vacsie ako v skutocnosti (napr. zahrnaju aj tien budovy, alebo je viacero budov zlepenych do jednej). ano na dedinach pri starych domoch je aj kataster niekedy zle, ale uz sa to zlepsuje.
Okrem toho je niekedy rozdiel, ze kataster ma podorys a na Ortofoto vidime strechu, ktora previsa cez steny (niekedy aj meter), takze je v katastri budova jemne mensia. Ale o tychto nepresnostiach nehovorim. Proste budovy Inspire su uletene aj o viac metrov, zasahuju na vedlajsi pozemok co nemaju, atd.
Znazim sa len zistit, ci tie budovy z Inspire boli zle len pred dvoma rokmi, alebo je to stale tak zle.

Tu som niektore budovy opravil, vsimnite si tie, kde som zmenil source=ÚGKK SR Inspire na nieco ine (ZBGIS alebo Ortofoto): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=159140904 .

Dobre je to viditelne ked si v JOSM pod OSM udaje podlozite vrstvu katastra a pod to Ortofoto. Tie dve dobre sedia (okrem previsov striech, alebo budov co ani nie su v katastri). Inspire je velmi casto od nich posunute alebo budova ma iny tvar.

Zdravim, pisete sice vsetky zdroje, ale asi ste ich navzajom neporovnavali. Lebo co ste naimportovali budovy so zdrojom Inspire su casto hrozne a dost nesedia na kataster a Ortofotomozaiku. Alebo zeby sa odvtedy budovy v Inspire vylepsili? Viete to nejako zbehnut znovu a porovnat?

Hi, why creating a Fann perfumery that is already there for 10 years?

Hi, how did you find out the street name? Are they any street signs showing it? The official kadastre map does not have a name for this street.

Dakujem za otvorenie ciest.
Ale preco je len kratky usek way/963239191 jednosmerny?

Additionally, you changed "disused:" prefix to "was:" prefix, which have different meaning. This change again isn't needed for the problem you are solving.

Ok, maybe, but the route=bus tags are not mandatory, especially in a relation that is not type=route. That change didn't need to be done.

A aky zdroj je OFM 23?

Stanica Filialka nefunguje/neexistuje. Naco je dobre ju pridavat ako funkcnu stanicu?

Why do you put outdoor_seating=no on every building, that does not even have any amenity (like a restaurant) that could have outdoor seating?

Ok, thanks.

What triangle is not valid? Why do you write that into every changeset?

Also please do not add duplicate restaurants, even with lower quality data than the existing one.