aceman444's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 147924262 | about 1 year ago | There is no asphalt at way/681682383 . What are you trying to do? |
| 47613599 | about 1 year ago | Zdravim, preco bolo potrebne bicycle=yes na node/330748931 ? Cez 'entrance' by malo pustit vsetky formy dopravy. Aka navigacia s tym nefunguje? |
| 158575144 | about 1 year ago | Super, dakujem za prelozenie liniek MHD. |
| 157897712 | about 1 year ago | Yes, the relation had no valid 'type', intentionally. Now it still does not have a valid type. Why do you think your solution is better? |
| 158535430 | about 1 year ago | Super, dakujem. |
| 147924276 | about 1 year ago | Hi, you should add the 'disused:' prefix into the existing tag, like "amenity=pub" -> "disused:amenity=pub", not invent a new tag like shop=yes (which actually has almost zero information and does not relate to what kind of amenity is disused). If you want to mark a vacant shop space/premise, you tag shop=vacant (without any disused prefix). |
| 156744814 | about 1 year ago | What kind of piste should way/1222203464 be ? You did not add any details, if it is cross-country skiing or downhill. highway=piste does not mean much. Also it is there is no piste to be seen on Ortofotomozaika (but that one is older than your visit, so maybe they built a piste there now, but it needs more details added. |
| 130254564 | about 1 year ago | Dakujem, podla popisu to vyzera teraz lepsie. Aj ked teda to parkovisko nad vezou by som potom dal 'private', kedze hodnota 'permit' znamena, ze povolenie si treba vyziadat, ale dostane ho bezne skoro kazdy (len musi vybavit potrebne procedury). To asi nie je tento pripad, ked povolenie dostanu len najomcovia a zamestnanci. Dal by som teda 'private', ze len vlastnik a nim par vybranych subjektov, nie ktokolvek. A co tie male parkoviska za Hotelom FIS ako node/6935344392 ? Tam mozu tiez len zakaznici (ako je to teraz nakreslene), alebo len zamestnanci? Tiez sa vsetky 3 velke parkoviska nazyvaju "Lyžiarsky areál Štrbské Pleso" hoci maju 3 rozne rezimy parkovania a prevadzkovatelov? |
| 152756305 | about 1 year ago | Zdroj? |
| 129868931 | about 1 year ago | To forester's_lodge je hrozne. Co s tym urobime? |
| 136389438 | about 1 year ago | node/10916959617 , ten nazov je dost divny. A to co ste dali do 'description' nepatri nahodou do 'inscription'? Znie to, akoby to bolo na tabuli priamo napisane. A nie je to nahodou pamatnik? |
| 153410078 | about 1 year ago | Ako viete? Aky je zdroj? |
| 153584145 | about 1 year ago | Taktiez je potrebne jazero "vyzerat" z okoliteho sutoviska, pomocou objektu multipolygon. Inak mate na rovnakom mieste sutovisko aj jazero, co asi nie je pravda. Opravil som to, ale davajte pozor. |
| 153584145 | about 1 year ago | Zdravim, aky je zdroj nazvov?
|
| 158136840 | about 1 year ago | Zdroj nazvu? |
| 157047165 | about 1 year ago | Zdravim, aky je zdroj tychto udajov? Nazov i poloha chaty? Lebo uvadzate len snimky ESRI a na nich nie je vidiet. Naopak, nejaka budova je vidiet na vychod odtialto. |
| 119004896 | about 1 year ago | Co ste vyriesili zmenou znacky 'name' na 'description', ked ste stale ponechali, ze "Vodovod", pritom tvrdite, ze to "vodovod" nie je. A uz vobec nie hranicny kamen. |
| 158121326 | about 1 year ago | Zdravim, na Slovensku mame aj lepsi zdroj snimok ako Bing mapy (Ortofotomozaika SR). Jedine ak by boli snimky Bing vyrazne novsie. Ale urcite nie su ostrejsie. Taktiez sa Vam pridavane oblasti prekryvaju, ci "nedoliehaju". Preco su medzi oblastami uzke neoznacene pasiky? Zdravim, prosim piste zmysluplnejsie popisy sad zmien: osm.wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn |
| 130254564 | about 1 year ago | Zdravim, kde sa da ziskat to povolenie na parkovanie?
|
| 140644850 | about 1 year ago | Myslim, ze to bolo povodne lepsie. Opisny nazov asi nebude dobre, a ci je to nejaka vyznamna atrakcia je otazne. |