Not an import. Just drawing from Bing imagery following on ground survey and collecting GPS tracks.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155980832

Not an import. Just drawing from Bing imagery after conducting on ground survey and recording gps tracks
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155982843

Why does tiger import make this flagged? I’m improving the data accuracy with on ground verification.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156391682

Not an import. Just hand drawn from bing imagery while in the field and recording GPS traces.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155989767

While tagging for the render this fix did work to display the local park name on the map in openstreetmap-carto. Normally I would not do this but since the Grey Hill feature is a relic of GNIS import and not known in the memory of locals, has no significance, and does not represent anything on the ground (a slight hill on a former golf course) I believe it is acceptable in this case.

Hi, thanks for the note. It was a multi-stage process and I tagged the tees and baskets before I connected them with holes. I wondered about needing to remove the names from the nodes. Thanks for pointing that out. The untagged node is only to show that the hole has to go around the water tower. It is in the middle of the hole way and therefore does not have any tags.

As for your point on the leisure=disc_golf_course node, do you mean I should add that to a central point (or the test basket at the start of the course) in addition to listing it on the relation? I think that's what you're saying. I will do that.

Thanks for checking my work and improving the map and making me a better mapper of disc golf areas. :)

Ah! Quite right. Thank you. Now your comment makes sense.

What doesn’t that mean? And why the thumbs down?

building was not physically there. Area has been renovated recently and this is now a parking lot.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145235133

moving tags from node to area for better accuracy.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145314265

Converting ways to relations to reduce overlapping ways.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145314925

Moved tags from ways to relation to reduce overlapping ways.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144590001

Fixing means making something whole or complete. If you don’t accept these corrections your maps will be broken. Not sure why this flags for a suspect word. I’d love to know so I can use better descriptions.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144571293

Moving tags from ways to relations to reduce overlapping ways.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144571260

Moving tags from ways to relations to minimize overlapping ways.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144567994

Thanks for the explanation. I’ll look into it and take your general practice into account. I appreciate the feedback.

Good day, I just discovered you reverted changes I made to cleaning up tag errors around fort Leavenworth a year ago. Why did you revert these changes? Your comment does not indicate anything wrong with my edits.

Moving tags from ways to relations to minimize duplicate ways.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144531267

Moved tags from ways to relations to minimize overlapping ways.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144530506

Just fixing a broken relation.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144530523