OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
72722013 over 6 years ago

Didn’t realize it was reverted. I was cleaning up a couple places where I imported over buildings already there. Not sure why JOSM didn’t detect the conflict. It happened in a couple places. Let me know if I’m doing something wrong.

68317532 over 6 years ago

Removed building=residential tags from nodes of the building.

68317465 over 6 years ago

Removed errant building=residential tags on the nodes of the building.

68317318 over 6 years ago

Removed building=yes tags from nodes of the building.

72274268 over 6 years ago

Trail source included recorded GPX of the trail.

71685745 over 6 years ago

Thanks for the clarification. :)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71685745

68486726 over 6 years ago

I reviewed and seems to be legitimate. Improved accuracy of coastline and deleted minor residential road that was replaced with the correct location.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68486726

65878042 almost 7 years ago

House address should not be on the road. Please place addresses over the buildings so it is clear on which side of the street they are located.

65878808 almost 7 years ago

The proper way is not to delete the road but to mark it private. This should tell the navigation apps not to use it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65878808

66508918 almost 7 years ago

Looks like duplicate road parallel to residential road. Recommend moving residential road or deleting it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66508918

66431602 almost 7 years ago

Duplicate houses drawn on top of other houses. Recommend not importing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66431602

66428329 almost 7 years ago

Checked current tags are correct. Research area is tagged.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66428329

66414296 almost 7 years ago

Messaged user on OSM to request they add comments to their changesets in the future.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66414296

66414440 almost 7 years ago

Stop signs are designed correctly.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66414440

66415010 almost 7 years ago

Thank you for adding buildings to the map. As you continue to map please use the option to make buildings square/rectangular and also add tags to the area that identify it as a building. These untagged areas will not render on the map as buildings. -Thanks
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66415010

61605097 over 7 years ago

Thanks for contributing to OSM. I have reviewed some of your buildings and noticed that you put the street name in with the address number. These are two different fields. Also, you can right click on the building line and choose to have it make the building rectangular. This is handy when drawing squarish things like buildings. Just makes the map cleaner. Keep up the good work!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61605097

61610153 over 7 years ago

Basketball court looks good.

61272848 over 7 years ago

Walls. Must have hit tab before it populated.

56398757 over 7 years ago

Yeah, looks great! Small changes. You are doing a great job of updating the area. Thanks for all the work!

56398757 over 7 years ago

Airlock, nice job providing so many great updates in the area. I was checking out your tags since I was not familiar with "Allotment" used in the SWIMGA. Do you not think it would be better tagged with leisure=garden, type=botanical? Botanical says it is used for display or education gardens (as well as scientific). Since this is a display garden it might work better. Open to debate.
garden:type=*