OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
9690339 about 1 year ago

See my comment on your Note.

119044905 almost 2 years ago

Thanks, Mateusz. I don't know why it says anchors. It should be stands. I will correct it.

50165488 almost 2 years ago

Yes, that should be barrier=gate. I will fix it.

119136275 about 2 years ago

I noticed that the Gaylord Rockies hotel building relation no longer renders in OSM, and I don't know why that is. Relation: 13056728

73000042 about 2 years ago

I will remove the name tags from the tennis courts and basketball court. By the way, why isn't the hotel building rendering anymore?? I will contact the last person who edited it.

117927278 about 2 years ago

Here is the MnDOT page about it:

https://www.dot.state.mn.us/d6/projects/i90-hwy52/index.html

88534523 over 2 years ago

I think that shop=variety_store is fine.

10295852 over 2 years ago

I did see two lots at Sargent's Gardens, north of this changeset, that had names and I have removed the names and set access for the employee parking lot to "private".

10295852 over 2 years ago

I don't know what parking lots you're talking about. Did you already remove the names? (I don't see any names)

118679731 over 2 years ago

I guess deleting the golf course features was premature?

17019290 almost 3 years ago

Sorry. I don't know. These seem to be or are comparable to County roads. I'm not local to GJ. Maybe if you found someone local; you could also ask the people at Kaart in GJ.

89218051 over 3 years ago

What did you "restore"?

118075989 over 3 years ago

I would just simply say that all "motorway islands" should have the tag expressway=yes UNLESS the road also loses its dual carriageway 4-lane divided highway characteristics.

118075989 over 3 years ago

Well, it's just one tag and one without much consequence. I'm not sure when this short bit between actual motorway will be upgraded. I heard they want to build a new interchange on the north side of Pine Island or maybe at 500th Street (I think a 1/2 interchange based on the old at-grade crossing would make more sense). By the way, MnDOT considers US 52 between Pine Island and MN 55 East to be an expressway - their definition. They also refer to it and many others as Trunk Highways (TH 52, etc.). It's also considered a "super commuter" which I think describes how much of the traffic uses it - in *both* directions, to Rochester and to the Cities.

118079558 over 3 years ago

...and the goal (part of MnDOT's "Toward Zero Deaths" program) is for the entirety of US 52 between I-90 and I-94 to be up to Interstate standards by no later than 2035.

118079558 over 3 years ago

I definitely believe that this section also should have expressway=yes. Keep in mind that it is also becoming more and more like a motorway. In fact, the stretch from Maple Way (near County 1 Boulevard) to about 415th Street (near County 50 Boulevard) is having ALL at-grade intersections removed as part of the current US 52 rebuild project, on top of the new interchange at the north end of MN 57 (Hader). I think there might be a few private driveways remaining when they are done in 2023. So pretty much a motorway at that point, although that's debatable, but definitely expressway at least.

118075989 over 3 years ago

This should definitely have the expressway=yes tag. I'm surprised you'd even question it, honestly. I don't know what else to say....

104712102 over 3 years ago

Is the Delhi-Amritsar-Katra Expressway still under construction or has it (or parts of it) been completed and opened to traffic?

122230745 over 3 years ago

Regarding Trans Haryana Expressway: This is now complete and open to traffic and I would map it as such but am unable to map the interchanges due to aerial imagery being not recent enough. I assume you, or someone in India, could use GPS to map it?

118531173 almost 4 years ago

Yes, I will do that. I think the best way would be to delete the relation and make a new one. I am not sure how that is done in iD? I know how to remove things from a relation, but not how to delete the relation itself.