Hi,
way/963359153 - farmland is not right.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.72064&lat=-30.15801&zoom=15

The best way to do that is using a multipolygon relation - a simple closed way around the outside (role 'outer' in the relation), then map the unused area as a closed way (role 'inner' within the relation).
Thanks for mapping some farmland. I also tag it with produce=crop.

Hi,
Looks to be a conflict between the boundaries and natural features ... they are both using the same nodes .. but for different things..
It is really annoying - OSM should have different mapping skins for the different things; land cover and land features, roads/railways paths and footways, admin boundaries, landuse ... it would make it much easier to edit ... and possibly for data consumers too?

I'm fixing a 'bear rock' closed way crossing itself ... but as usual when you come across one problem you find 10 more.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM...

Multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments, so there are 2 errors here. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.00072&lat=-38.32257&zoom=16

P.S. Maxar tends to be the most upto date imagery OSM has. Try it and see.

Hi,
Why have you made 2 relations for these buildings. They could be simple closed ways.. much easier.

The relation for 'Miami Ice' is not closed - this is an error.

Suggest

1) making Way: 537569927 a closed way with the tags for Miami Ice.
2) deleting both relations.

Relationship for South Bunbury administration boundary role changed back to 'outer'. The role 'inner' is an error made in this changeset.

Note: Align your imagery to things already in OSM, that way your added building will not cross roads, enter parks...

The landuse=residential overlaps buildings... suggesting that one part of the building is residential while the other part is not..?

Where waterways (eg drains) cross streets there should be something to indicate how the crossing is made .. in these cases it looks to be a cluvert, layer=-1.

Use the OSM wiki to look things up
eg tunnel=culvert

Hi,

Instead of mapping the shops as areas, map them as nodes. The areas are buildings, map those as building=retail.

Yep. All good. It is a usefull skill to have for things like tree areas with other things inside them.

Hi

The relationship roles need to be swapped.

way/960956145 should have rolle 'outer' as the outermost way - the outside of the building.

The other 2 ways should have the role 'inner' for the inside walls of the building.

If you want to help 'fix' things then see
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=175.23999&lat=-38.91326&zoom=7

Hi
way/959936573 - building .. has an error .. two segments share a path. What you have tired to do is make a hole in the building.. that cannot be done with a simple way. The normal method of making a hole in some thing is to use a multipolygon relation, see osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon
I leave it to you to fix.

Not only shapes, colours and surfaces- those can come from the imagery.
But the other attributes - names, elevations that can come from other sources e.g. survey, knowledge..

In short - where the source is to be given in the changeset just state everything that is used, disregarding any 'confidence checks'?

Hi,
I have changed your 'bear_rock' entry for Cape Trib.
The rock does not stop at the coastline but continues on.
I have intergrated the other edge with the tree line.

I note that the coastline here is incorrectly mapped - it should be at the high water mark. Also the beaches would be better mapped past the coast line in many areas.

-----------
The reason why I have done this? Because the way you entered crossed itself flagging an error in OSMInspector. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.45605&lat=-30.87017&zoom=6 Note the error will be gone with an update soon.

You must not use copyright data .....

No exceptions.

Navionics nautical chart - copy right!

Reversion is indicated!

You cannot use that data!
See osm.wiki/Australian_data_catalogue#Queensland ... If it is green you can use it. But not otherwise.

I think this changeset may need to be reverted due to the source.

--------------------
The reason why the park boundary is details is because it comes from official sources.
The coastline is probably hand drawn from imagery - a tedious process leading to the rough nature of it.

I would think the reserve includes the lake, that would protect the lake.

Hi,
welcome to OSM.
You have not stated a source for this change. Maxar is usually the most upto date.

There are errors in Way: 747129881 - natural beach. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.02388&lat=-20.24235&zoom=16

Looking at the coast line here shows some plants being submerged, suggesting that the coastline is in error here.

Personally as the coastline is the hi tide mark I take the beach out to sea wards to show the extent of the sand - at least to where it fades out.

If you need help fixing this - leave a message.