Warin61's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 108858687 | over 4 years ago | https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.03864&lat=-37.78672&zoom=16 Click on the blue/green lines to see the error. |
| 108851829 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OSM. Administration boundaries (the PSMA sourced stuff) are not roads ... e.g.
Both have been tagged as roads .. these tags will be removed and the administration boundaries repaired. Note: these administration boundaries are a problem for all of us, it is not just you. |
| 108801441 | over 4 years ago | |
| 90654644 | over 4 years ago | What is the source of your information for hole numbers? |
| 90654644 | over 4 years ago | There is NO grass here. |
| 108619665 | over 4 years ago | Hi,
|
| 108587564 | over 4 years ago | Hi
|
| 107769809 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Are all your bus stops sourced from ptv.vic.gov.au ? The ptv.vic.gov.au is not a source that can be used in OSM. See osm.wiki/Australian_data_catalogue#Victoria |
| 108454355 | over 4 years ago | What is the source of adding golf=cartpath to these roads??? One of the water ways is off the golf area yet it is now tagged as a golf hazard. Why? |
| 108369863 | over 4 years ago | Hi,
I cannot see the sand bunker you have entered - Way: 966204342 - see way/966204342#map=19/-34.96340/138.52514 I have looked with Bing and Maxar Premium and .. err no. Looks to some rocks inside that area but no sand. Can you explain? |
| 108340748 | over 4 years ago | Hi, I take it the names for these new streams came from the NSW DCS Base Map? You will find the Base Map to be usefull where things are under tree cover. |
| 107684309 | over 4 years ago | Tag it disused if that is suitable. Maxar shows it very green while Bing shows it in use. My thinking is that the farmer may well use the track for harvesting, planting etc so it may become 'in use' once more. Some renders won't show disused - as in it vanishes, others render it differently. |
| 108287043 | over 4 years ago | Correction.
|
| 107684309 | over 4 years ago | I would think that the farmer uses these tracks to access the adjacent fields.
A router should pay attention to the access tags, the access may not show on some maps. The problem of rendering should not impact the entry of data. Rather than delete data - add to it. In this case add access=private. If you have evidence that the track is 'disused' then add the tags for that. Only remove things when they are well and truly gone. |
| 107684309 | over 4 years ago | HI, The tag "access=private" can be used to say that a road is not open to the public - that is it is a private road.
Reverted and access tags added to tracks. |
| 108181846 | over 4 years ago | You have never been here? I have. Pages Creek Rd is tertiary, certainly not service! The golf course does not run across this rd. I have;
|
| 86929981 | over 4 years ago | Hi, The building outlines look to be displaced by 5 metres relative to the mapped roads. The imagery used to produce the building footprints can be corrected to the road position and thus keep everything relative to one another correct. |
| 107830709 | over 4 years ago | Hi, The name should be for the name only .. not a description such as 'Public Reserve'. See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only The relation for 'Public Reserve' has 3 members.. one of them has no role - see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.69958&lat=-42.89495&zoom=14 |
| 107763502 | over 4 years ago | Take a look on the above link -shows the part where the things meet up. What I would do is separate the ways at the nodes where they meet, delete both the new short ways where they meet. This would then be ok. However for extra points, combine the ways that touch each outer into one continuous way. Note: I have never used iD so I cannot help you there. But this is what I'd do. I use JOSM. |
| 107463399 | over 4 years ago | See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.44583&lat=-28.07450&zoom=18 You should fix this, I find I learn best by fixing my own errors. |