a) From my reading of highway=motorway_junction this names an exit off the motorway - not the entry to it.

b) the Way: Windybanks Interchange (8063077) is seen as you go under the way .. just like you see the name of Way: Falcon Street (171334934) when you go under it. That does not mean 'Falcon Street' is the OSM interchange used here. It is the name of the street going over the motorway.

c) the name still remains where it should be - on the Way: Windybanks Interchange (8063077)

That is my thinking. Does that make sense?

Not a great change set comment.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Park areas are best determined using the LPI Base Map .. not imagery. The park/reserves don't necessarily follow land covers.

Not all of the area tagged as grass is grass.

The house numbers in Colgong Crescent are wrong.

This change set will need checking.
The source statement is incorrect - you cannot get house numbers nor street names from imagery.

So what is the source for this information?

A reply is expected.

Two problems;
Is there a left turn from Wheatleigh St to Chandos St??
Thechange has broken the boundaries for Crows Nest .. and some other suburb/s. .

Hi,
"Add local stuff" is not a good change set comment .. see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Hi,
There is a mapper who thinks the cemetery is part of the Anthony Beale Reserve ..as near as I can make out from their mapping.
You may like to put your thoughts forwards on their changeset changeset/61721512

No!

You are leaving the relation with one member - the cemetery as an inner.

Either;
a) delete the relation - so the cemetery is part of the park.
Or
b) restore the relation with the outer as the way presently tagged as the park.

Your choice. Is the cemetery part of the park? then option a) .. otherwise option b)

Routes Mt Ollivier and Muller Hut are the same.
Suggest deletion of Mt Ollivier. Possible alt_name addition to Muller Hut.

There are 2 main issues raised here that are applicable to other change sets of yours.

Issue 1. Copyright.
A) The change set source does not state the guide book you are apparently using. And it is now too late to include it there. None of the features that apparently use the guide book have any source statements linking to the guide book.
B) There does not appear within OSM to be a documented valid copyright acceptance of use within OSM.

Corrective actions need to be made. I would think that first any copyright agreement needs to be documented in OSM. Secondly source tags need to be included with every feature to state where the information came from.

Issue 2. Tag Use.
A number of tag appear to be misused to link to a particular guide book. So far as found in New Zealand these are the ref, description and osmc:symbol tags.

Corrective actions also need to be made with the removal of these tags. If you feel the need to link to the guidebook then it needs to be done is some appropriate way. For example guidebook:publisher=title, section. What ever tag you decide on using, ensure it is compatible with any OSM existing documentation, if there is no OSM existing documentation then document it.

Note: these are my personal thoughts on the matter … others may have different views!

Take a look at https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=6215093 click on the elevation profile .. that shows
Accumulated ascent: 695 m
Accumulated descent: 700 m

There will be some errors in there .. but might be better data than that book.

a) How am I supposed to know that from this changset comments/source or the tags on the relation? I am not a mind reader.

b) Where in OSM is the permission shown?
I have looked on osm.wiki/Contributors and on osm.wiki/Import/Catalogue.

If I see a symbol on the map I expect to see the same symbol on the trail.

From osmc:symbol=*
"Finally, don't just add a osmc:symbol to a hiking route because it looks good on the map. osmc:symbol should always reflect the route symbol that is used as waymarker or on guideposts to give the direction. "

Tracks that have no symbol can be rendered in other way - e.g. using the full name. This reflects at lest some of the track signs - they too use the full track name.

Ummm
BNT update to map 10 (copyright) May 2018
" Once reaching the ACT border turn right onto Dukes Road and cross cavaletti you will be off road all way to Hall. Space for horse truck or float approx. 500metres south of
ACT border sign at the Mulligans Flat style and horse cavaletti, in Mulligans Flat arking area.. "

I think you'll find the official BNT route goes north of where you have it. Cyclist can use the route OSM has outlined, but a horse rider with a second horse as pack animal .. I don't think they will want to contend with city traffic. The northern BNT route may also be used by BNT cyclist and BNT walkers too. Thought cyclists find cavaletti a challenge.

Hi,

Don't the horses of the BNT go north - they normally rest up in Hall .. use the Canberra Centennial Trail???
I think the route you have is the cyclist alternative path.

Hi,
I believe the symbol and reference used for the hiking relation come from the book Rother Wanderführer, Neuseeland. As these are not 'on the ground' I don't think they should not be used in OSM.

It would be like using an English travel guide to detail Berlin with their notes.

Hi,
This changeset has broken the admin boundary Lang Lang, Yannathan and Caldermeade.
Partial reversion of this changeset to restore these relations.

Oh,
The change set comments .. not the best ..
please read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.

The Forsyth Park boundaries are shown in the LPI Base Map - these are the legal boundaries of the park. Outer areas might be seen as part of the park, but legally they are not. They can be legally part of the road verge or some other thing. Probably still a council responsibility, but not part of the park.

Possible? Oh .. that is from a roundabout ..
there are 2 duplicated segments that I did not pick up on.

Way: Puhinui Road (615737626) is preferred as that includes the roundabout in the routing.
Way: Puhinui Road (24709480) is not preferred as it goes directly from Tom Pearce Drive - not through the roundabout. A router would not pick up on the roundabout and miss instructions for the roundabout.

So .. I have deleted way 24709480 and move the route membership on it over to way/615737626
Done. That is the reverse of what you wanted, but it is what is there on the ground - a roundabout that needs to be navigated through.

There are problems with Onehunga to Manukau via Airport bus route .. missing bits .. missing stops .. lots to do there.
I was concerned with the Te Araroa route as that was very mixed up - not a sequenced set of ways. That is important as it is used to generate gpx files and elevation profiles by https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=5!-41.1291!183.7799

Hope that works for you .