Warin61's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 61367654 | over 7 years ago | OK.
Where I have estimated things from a personal survey .. then I list that as my source. If something is lacking in imagery .. or there is more up to date imagery .. then I usually put the tag source= on to the individual thing in OSM ..to alert others so they don't get questioned or deleted/changed without some checking. A personal survey with some estimation would get something like source=survey with GPS and photos .. just say what you did. No one is going to be picky on it, but in 10 years time someone may have great imagery and be able to do a better job, but they need to see where the stuff that is there in OSM came from in order to estimate what is 'better'. The only thing I saw as the source was bing imagery .. and that is not right. Oh, be carefull with the use of plans .. they can be copyright. Keep mapping. |
| 15471325 | over 7 years ago | Hi,
|
| 61367654 | over 7 years ago | Hi,
But, I ask again, what is the source? Note that Google is not legally usable within OSM. PS This is an inquiry. Not a criticism. |
| 61367654 | over 7 years ago | Again .. what is the source? It is not bing as that shows a farm field here. |
| 45478783 | over 7 years ago | Hi,
What is your source? It is not Bing... |
| 61536735 | over 7 years ago | Breaks relation of Sydney Harbor. Removes the end of wharf 5 Circular Quay ...
|
| 61499691 | over 7 years ago | I have no idea what LVE means. Explain. The building you entered as Way: 615521052 .. crosses it self. The bing imagery is very poor to see that kind of detail from. |
| 38280899 | over 7 years ago | Done the southern part ... ~100 nodes with source:maxspeed .. but no maxspeed. I did a search ..so that should be all the nodes done for this area. |
| 60102631 | over 7 years ago | Well .. there we are now.
So, are you now convinced that the landcover tag does not cause a problem at present ??? |
| 61352534 | over 7 years ago | Things that go under bridges are not necessarily in tunnels. Sub stations are not military areas. -----------------------
|
| 61351728 | over 7 years ago | Reverted. No point in saying why. |
| 61314653 | over 7 years ago | Hi,
I hope what you are using are the LPI NSW base map or Imagery. That is what you have ready access to using JOSM. Sixmaps is the commercial arm of LPI ... Please correct your source statements from here on? |
| 61291888 | over 7 years ago | In this change set:
You changed the name of Manly Creek to Manly Creek - Reserve and added "reservation"="members_only" This is wrong .. you need to change it back. School classes are not tourist attractions, delete them. ----------
----------------
|
| 60102631 | over 7 years ago | No response. I'll reintroduce the tag you had of clearcut and see what happens then. |
| 60102631 | over 7 years ago | Ok .. I am now happy that it renders. Are you happy with this way now? Would you like to add the tag clearcut to it and see what that does? |
| 61140851 | over 7 years ago | Hi,
|
| 61134207 | over 7 years ago | PS redbackspider does NOT communicate. |
| 61134207 | over 7 years ago | Because redbackspider copied Le Desert from France to Australia in a previous changeset? |
| 60102631 | over 7 years ago | Arr .. the wood area over laps the scrub area... merging Node: 5713634516 with Node: 5713635454 might fix it.. ok those nodes combined into 516 ...looking for other problems ... none found. Ok, wait for the changes to filter through. |
| 60102631 | over 7 years ago | Now that is strange ... Not rendering here as 601076497 natural=scrub, but when I download it to JOSM it is rendering (well untill zoom level 12)? Way: Knowles Wood (388771229) is rendering as natural=scrub. So that is fine. Rendering with natural=scrub and landcover=scrub on; Way: 482504516 Way: 482502486 Way: 224779624 Way: 276689206 Way: 318149886 ---------------------
|