Hi,
the name tag is only for names - so Omega Apartments (under construction) is not good.
Use the description tag to describe it ..
But in this instance use the construction key thus ..
building=construction
name=Omega Apartments
description=construction of apartments

I have been past it several times. No houses. I have not seen a sign to say it is a park ..nor a name of the park. I'll have to stop and really look at it next time .. if I remember. It does form the function of a park.
Last time they were doing some works to the footpath there. It has been a while so that should have finished..

Hi,
No 362 Marsden Road .. no house there .. it is a park. The 362Rs can be removed around there too... Don't know if parks have addresses.

Going well?

Thanks for the info. Reverted. Added note and source tags to that section of Duke St so that other mappers can see the information.

Removed name. It is now only tagging a tree area.

The relation has inners that share segments with outers .. that is not ideal.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=114.58523&lat=-23.08396&zoom=12&opacity=0.58

Hi,
Here you have a lift gate with access=customers ... but then you ban then coming by foot, bicycle, car, horse, motorcycle .. what .. do they fly in?
Node: 4880311080

Hi,
I am confused by the gate with the tags
access=no
foot=yes
bicycle=yes
motorcar=yes
motorcycle=yes

So what is not allowed through this gate? Motorcars, motorcycles , bicycles and pedestrians are all allowed through it.

Hi,
In this change set you have introduced a new node with the tags for a gate.
There is no road here in OSM now.
Your change set comments make no sense in relation to this gate...

Roads that are private should be tagged access=private, the road should still exist in OSM - it is a navigational feature and may be of use in some emergency.

The name=* should NOT be used for a description! Use the description=* tag.

Use the OSM wiki to help you find tags to use and to find out how to use them ...
for change set comments see
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

I have reintroduced the road (as a track .. it may be better as a srevice road with service = driveway?) and bridge through here .. with access=private on all of it.

P.S. If it were me wanting to discourage traffic on 'my' road .. another gate t the end of cavan rd should do. A line on a map does not indicate right of access.

Note: the bridge looks to be significant .. not put in by the council? If it were put in by the council they may think of it as public. Err I note there are2 councils involved Cavan and Jeir.

Hi,
Regarding the wood relation .. that is not how to do it.
Here I would make one way for the outside - place that as the outer role in the wood relation.

Then place the way for the water into the wood relation - with the role inner.

Hi,
This relation is not closed.. more work to do.

This has left Doreen with only one member .. and not closed.

Did you really mean to delete all those ways?

Looks like a mess to me.

When you make a new way for these turn restrictions ...
You are overlaying the old way with another .. that is not good - it can be seen in OSMinspector - routing as a duplicate way.
Rather than making a new way .. split the old way at the point desired. This means there are not two ways occupying the same space - meaning a turn can still be make from/to the old way .. so your turn restriction will be bypassed!

Here .. I have left Relation: 8148253 intact but moved the old way a little off to the side with a new node so you can see the problem you are creating.
Fix it. And then go back and fix any others you have created. I have fixed a few and gotten use to seeing your name attached to them.
OSMinspector is here https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=149.38758&lat=-33.56731&zoom=6&opacity=0.83&overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5,duplicate_ways

Hi,
These buildings are usually 'square' meaning the corners are usually right angles.
In iD there is the 'Square corners tool' (Shortcut S).

In addition .. you could also add addresses to there from the LPI Base Map.
Hope that helps.

Hi,

When you make a roundabout .. the roads connect to it ... they should not overlay the roundabout but stop at the connection to the roundabout .. and then restart at the exit point of the roundabout.

No response. Deleted.

Hi,
You are creating a number of errors.. for example in this change set
Relation: RI Mangrove (8589561)
has an intersection between the multipologon ways ..
see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.25738&lat=-27.65014&zoom=10&opacity=0.67

As I recall most of these errors are similar - ways crossing themselves.

I am sorry .. but OSM does not store temporary events. These would be best kept in your own system as an overlay.

See osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

A few things about his change set that attract my attention.

a) the change set comment of 'pokemon'. Past edits have been made for/by pokemon players that have placed fantasy object into OSM. OSM is about the real world and thse fantasy objects are not appreciated inside OSM. For an idea of good change set comments please read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

b) There looks to be an error in dragging the junction of Main and Finns lanes northwards past McFarlane St.

c) The addition of a swimming pool as a node. This would be better as an area - a close way. It would also be better tagged with access=private as I don't think that it is open to the public.

d) the address of 10 Leopold Street is incorrect. Further addresses are not normally place on the swimming pool. You could place it on a single node, or map the building and place the address on that.

Start again? Suggest you just do the swimming pool by it self and see how that goes? Then possibly do the house and see how that is?

Have fun. There appear to be a few park like objects that are on the LPI Base Map but not in OSM .. Young Park - Birmingham to Walpole St, Fyffe Park, Sarah Daniels Court to name a few.

Yet that is the interpretation that I have come to. Otherwise .. what name do you give the way over the motorway there? Those signs do state the name of the road over the motorway ... so this is only logical (Dr Spock aproves?).

As for the problem of motorway interchanges .. Perhaps place=motorway_interchange? Tagging the truth is better than taking the nearest appropriate tag .. because some one like me will come along and say 'that is not right' .. and we have problems. So .. make a new tag ..and use it?
A different view ... osm.wiki/User:Rullzer