Hi,
node/429521996 tagged as barrier .. OSM is not clear if this apples to both service roads or one only. I'd think it should be moved to where it looks like the fence is ?

Hi,

relation/16130683 only have one way and in other changeset of yours relation/16112688 also only has one way. In both relations the single member has the role 'inner' so they make no sense by themselves.

These need to be fixed... I leave them for you to fix.

Hi
The 'name' of "Mount Ommaney Centre Car Park" looks to me more like a description than the road name? The might be a 'direction sign' that says it, but is it the road name???
Please read osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Hi,
Pitches are the playing area. What are names as 'Park' and mapped here are 'landuse=recreation_ground'. I have made that change and added the pitches. Hope that helps.

Hi

Roundabout flare roads have the same name as the roads they lead to.

fixmes removed and name added....

Hi
relation/16111790 ... has no outer... ???
See relation/16111790

Hi,

Relation 16112650...
How do you know this is meadow? It could be used for crops? If you are not certain then 'farmland' is far less specific....

Hi,

The 2 relations ... not correct.

They should be one relation containing both ways, one way with the role 'outer' for the outside, the other with the role 'inner' for the island.

See relation/16112688#map=19/-38.14722/144.27968

Hi,
The line (way) tagged as material=rock will not 'work' and has been deleted.

I'd draw an area with natural=bare_rock and that would 'work' in OSM.
and
tagged as natural=bear_

Cannot be bothered to fix it? Me neither .. deleted.

Hi
Building way crosses itself. This is an error that the JOSM validator would have identified before you uploaded .. and should be fixed preferably by you so you learn from the error so as not to repeat it.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.84535&lat=-37.76451&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Hi,

The changes to administration boundaries have been reverted. These boundaries come from government data and are not based on imagery.

Please make changeset comments so other can see what was trying to be achieved.

Hi,

What 'help' ??? The changeset comment 'help' may imply that some help is needed???

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

Unfortunately there is a copyright notice on http://www.victorianrailways.net/about_wanted/about_wanted.html

OSM is very strict on copyright so this changeset has been reverted. Sorry about that.

When they 'move' they usually brake and show up on https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.13628&lat=-33.74316&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

That updates daily.

The official gov data is 'PSMA' available on the OSM Australian Data page. Get that as the basis of replacing any creek boundaries.

When you work on a creek .. download the OSM creek, then 'File' 'download along' -(I set it to 1m distance and not more than 1 km) and using 'more tools' 'replace geometry' replace the old with your new. This should don the job .. but any side creeks might get displaced where they join the new entry.
The 'down load along' gets the side creeks and should get any boundaries that use the creek.

I think that will work.

I have added the cricket. However the other sports are not obvious to me ..

See
way/1090733814
way/1185627654

I prefer individual mapping as that shows the individual sports are present.

Added netball - way/1185627656

Hi
The 'landuse=grass' is actually an AFL pitch. Corrected.

Hi,

There are OSM problems with that relation.
See the QA tool https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=138.52990&lat=-34.65386&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Seethe OSM wiki osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

This looks very confused! The name is used multiple times... would this not be a single 'place' with the name? OSM guide says 'one feature = one OSM entry' I'd map an outer way with the name and a place=something tag. Then map the commercial etc landuses without a name... Hope that helps.

Hi,
The change to Wheeny Ck leads to changes to the following admin boundaries;
Sydney
Wheeny Ck
Kurrajong Hills
Kurrajong Heights
Kurrajong
Grose Vale