Not interested?
Deleted both relations...

Hi,

The footway (way/1202026342 way/1202026342#map=18/-37.86047/144.74936) is wrong... in that it crosses it self. While a human can understand it a computer makes hard work of it.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.74859&lat=-37.85975&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

The 'duplicate segment' is the issue. What is required is a 'multipolygon relation' with 2 ways - and 'outer' alone the outside of the footway and an 'inner' along the inside of the footway.

See
osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon#One_outer_and_one_inner_ring

Hi,

The relation roles should be reversed...

And 'area=yes' on the relation ways is incorrect.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.65886&lat=-38.06945&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

The '2022 Walking Trail Route 1' (13456569, v13) has 'operator=PFM' ...
What does PFM stand for???

Opps - sources are

PSMA for boundary
DCS Imagery for oneway

Opps...

Brush Island nature reserve broken... way/67176498 formed it and this changeset has broken it into two .. but not placed the second way into the relation/8278760.

Hi
Multipolygon inner ways cannot touch the outer way ...
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.94432&lat=-32.08965&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Hi,
relation/16213405 is not correct. See

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.58627&lat=-28.79220&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Multipolygon_created_by_only_one_polygon

In addition the DCS Base Map has the area with probably better definition than simple aerial imagery.

Hi,

When you add a road name .. the 'street', 'road', 'highway' etc sections have the leading character capitalized ... e.g. 'Street', 'Road', 'Highway' etc.

Hi
This gate you have placed on Leakes Road near the railway crossing ... so this road cannot be used across the rail way crossing??? Yet the imagery looks to have vehicles using it... old imagery? If the crossing no longer exists then that section of road should be removed...

Hi,
They are the barrier=log .. nodes
956995125
956995577
956996223
957004693
9197109340
9197109357
9256185267
9256185268
9256185270
9256185271
9263434819
9309827347
9309827355
9309827358

The Rossiter Pavilion ... why not use the outer way of this building as the inner in the pedestrian area .. rather than used all the building parts???

Hi
The relation/16193886 has some members simply tagged with area=yes, these tags have been removed as they convey no information, there ways already enclose an area.

Hi,
This changeset was partially reverted to restore administration boundaries for Pitt Town and Pitt Town Bottoms.

I have reset this to a State Forest - landuse=forest and corrected the boundaries.

Hi
The Armidal State Forest is managed by the Forestry Corporation, it is a plantation to produce timber. While it serves a secondary purpose of recreation, as do many State Forests, it's primary function is to produce timber... The boundaries are available on the DCS Base Map ...

Hi
The tags on these barriers of foot=no, bicycle=no means that bicycles and walkers cannot proceed, they have no access ... but other things do - motor vehicles, horse riders are ok. Is that what you intended???

Hi,

Which road is this gate on?

If it is no the 'Goodarragardar Power Line Rd' .. does the 'Stokes Hut Trail' join on the western or eastern end of the gate?

Hi,
relation/16170158 is not closed. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=138.31137&lat=-35.45474&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Further .. it looks like it is part of the golf course over the road in which case that way should be included in this relation. And the golf course has a web page that should be included in the tags for the relation along with a golf course name...

Hi,
The lift gate on node/9835140984 looks to be a left over from the past? I have deleted it but moved the tagging to 2 nodes 11092784856 and 11092784857 on the service road - these could be a height restriction warning thingy thou???