Warin61's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 28131228 | over 6 years ago | Err .. these are comments on a changeset. Don't see how to start a new changeset comment other than making it part of the previous comments. |
| 70970996 | over 6 years ago | There are many bus route problems... Market Street traveling from the west to go north on Armstrong St has to go all the way around the roundabout as there is no direct connection between the two despite there crossing...
Many many more. Perhaps Potlatch is not the right tool for this job? I only use JOSM so I don't know. I'm inclined to revert and see what that does.. possibly the bus route was buggered before your change... I am not local so cannot simply 'fix it' from my knowledge, I'd have to go back to where it was in OSM. |
| 70970996 | over 6 years ago | Hi,
Do you want to fix this? |
| 70971799 | over 6 years ago | Hi,
|
| 70942477 | over 6 years ago | Hi,
Please repair the relation. |
| 42114367 | over 6 years ago | Hi,
|
| 70905605 | over 6 years ago | If the app is directing traffic alone one way roads in the wrong direction then the app needs fixing. This could be a right hand drive vs left hand drive thing??? Don't know.. I'm not using it. |
| 70905636 | over 6 years ago | Opps .. wrong way around.. ! My error. |
| 70940587 | over 6 years ago | Then the app needs to be fixed, not the OSM data. Report the apps behavior to the app developers. |
| 70940587 | over 6 years ago | Why is there a route relation for Torrens Road? |
| 70905605 | over 6 years ago | Think about these restrictions. Where a road is one way traffic cannot be directed the other way, so there is no need to make a specific restriction that prevents traffic going the wrong way, it is inherent in the one way attribute. |
| 70905636 | over 6 years ago | As the road coming off the highway is one way .. there is no need for a no left turn into it! Delete this relation. |
| 70866756 | over 6 years ago | That is just creating more work for those that want more detail. Do the easy thing .. Do the entire suburb in one go. Those that want more detail can then do each block .. and then delete the single suburb residential area. Less work for you and them. Mean while I'll remove this relation. |
| 57888440 | over 6 years ago | Hi,
|
| 70866756 | over 6 years ago | Hi, The multipolygon relation has not worked well. Firstly .. the outer ways cannot touch one another .. and your making a lot of work for yourself by making new ways over the top of existing ways ... So .. A question .. What are you trying to achieve? Map residential areas? Ok... There are many methods to do that .. Map a city, the suburbs (more work), each block (most work but best detail). I'll start with a suburb? Select the outer roads/paths and use those as the outers in a multipolygon relation. This means the one way in OSM performs 2 function - as the road and as the outer part or residential area. This reduces the amount of memory that OSM takes as there is no need for 2 ways in the same place. Once the suburb is enclosed the job is done. Problems? Roads don't stop where the suburb does .. so split the road where required. Questions? Just ask here, or on one of the OSM methods of getting help. |
| 34791533 | over 6 years ago | Hi
The LPI base map has a smaller park in that area |
| 62476651 | over 6 years ago | Hi,
|
| 70400668 | over 6 years ago | Hi
The outer ways share segments.
Those are against the 'rules'. Suggestion? Use the relation as it is .. but brake the outer ways where they share the location. Then make 2 more relations .. as suburbs with the individual names. |
| 70122081 | over 6 years ago | Salut,
Hi,
|
| 55664955 | over 6 years ago | Hi,
|