OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
62755563 over 7 years ago

Bet both ways?

I don't like land covers and land uses being the same ways.. leads to things like national parks being the end of tree cover. Not hard and fast on it though.

Pennant Hills Park is taken to the LPI boundary, they have increased the number netball courts there over time. They may well do the same at Canoon Rd?

As for the, umm, bit outside. The LPI base map would suggest that is allocated for residential houses, the council may have changed their minds and happy for it to be used for recreation. I have struck several National Park boundaries that are transgressed by farmers fields .. probably long before they were National Parks and anything like satellite imagery. The LPI boundary is in OSM and the farmers field is not .. (not taking about a few meters here ... a fair distance into the National Park).

I'll try to take a wander up there next week and see what is actually on the ground.

45479146 over 7 years ago

The building tag is for the building only .. not the block it sits on.

61621739 over 7 years ago

Hi,
The name tag is to be used for the name only. 'Footpath' is not the name.

-------------
Now read osm.wiki/Sidewalks for information on how to map footpaths.
As an example I have done the end of Koch St for you.

62751181 over 7 years ago

I have approximately centered the cricket to the center of the 2 soccer pitches, using OSM. If you require it better than that .. then fine tune it using what ever you want? Think you'll find the pitches move somewhat from year to year as the playing surfaces deteriorate with use. So I'm not too worried by some error is these, but I do like to see there existence on the map.

58648147 over 7 years ago

Hi,
are you certain Terrys Creek is visible in this area? The tagging of the past way shows it below ground level. I agree the LPI imagery suggest something ... but it could just be a concreted area.

60776332 over 7 years ago

Hii,
Deleted Way: Gundaring Road North (608451579) - duplication of what is already there.

62626306 over 7 years ago

way/625872547 tagged as building=retail .. in not a single building. I have removed this tagging.

62626667 over 7 years ago

Reverted.
The relation created was not an area.
The deletion of existing areas last information.
There were no relations changed by this changeset.

62564418 over 7 years ago

And looking back at your changesets...
they don't appear to have ANY change set comments ..
It will help you, and the rest of us, if you make change set comments...

62564418 over 7 years ago

Then someone is using your account.

I'd change your password. And check that no one is using your computer .. even an old computer.

Look at your changeset history and check back untill you find the ones that are 'yours'.
@John%20Embrey/history

62418830 over 7 years ago

If you tag it abandoned:highway= then it will render .. but very faintly. I'd go with that.

To make it not render ? Well any tag the renders are not using ... gone:highway= would do.

62540168 over 7 years ago

Hi
Relation: Hotel Bay View (8687586) .. has 2 ways ..as outers. But they share segments. Not likes by OSM inspector.
So this would be better as a single way - no relation required?

62567403 over 7 years ago

The name tag is for name only.

If you want to describe some thing .. use the description tag!!! e.g. Pizza Hut, Pool Lawn .. these are not names.

62413100 over 7 years ago

Could you please add change set comments? This informs others to what you are doing.
Read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

The track you added .. does it have a name? If not then noname=yes can be add to it.
I have add a fixme=continues to the present end.

62510326 over 7 years ago

Hi,
Would you please make change set comments? This help understand what you are doing .. without added work on others.
Read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

62564418 over 7 years ago

Hi,
For change set comments ideas see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

In this change set you made changes in Germany and Australia .. a fair distance apart. It would have been better to make them as 2 change sets - one in either county.
Node: 1797849488 (entrance to Robert Webster - G14 building) looks to be dragged away from where it should be .. I have dragged it back to where I think it should be.

62418830 over 7 years ago

Hi,
A problem is that it is still visible in some satellite vies and on the LPI base map. The problem now is that some one can come along and add it back in using the older information from these sources.
It is better to leave it in .. but change the tags so it does not render. Usually these things go from disused to abandoned and they become less visible on the map too.

62569175 over 7 years ago

Hi,
You can use the LPI Base Map to provide information - road names, addresses etc. Also the LPI Imagery is very good.
Oh, and welcome to OSM.

62476375 over 7 years ago

Hi,
These pitches are not for soccer. Look up netball, basketball and tennis.
If you look on the LPI Base Map you can see the area is a school.

62496263 over 7 years ago

Hi,

You need to check these additions for errors.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=116.89833&lat=-22.01886&zoom=11&opacity=0.60