Hi,
Some problems with relation/17427562 - Central Creek Linear Reserve / grass

First the relation inner way touches an outer way .. that brakes 'the rules' for multipolygon relations.

And then why use a relation at all? Simply tag the outer ways with grass and be done.

Then the issue is the name 'Central Creek Linear Reserve' .. this suggests a leisure=nature_reserve - independent of the land cover of grass ... I think it would include the trees?

What do you think?

Residential relation/7656605 now only has inners... broken.

This has removed all but 2 of the outer ways on the residential multipolygon relation/7656605 .... now broken.

I have reduced Wentworth Leagues Club - and added Ringrose Park - operated by the council...

Hi,
I think you have forgotten this broken bus route relation/13332390...

Thanks.. how did I miss that?

Hi,
Roundabouts should be tagged "junction=roundabout' then the tag 'oneway=yes' is redundant. This helps routers recognize that there is a roundabout.

Hi,
Multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.32336&lat=-38.23221&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

The simplest method to correct this is to place the tag 'landuse=residential' on each way and then delete the relation.

I'll leave it to you to make a correction?

Hi
The residential relation/17351391 outer ways share segments. This is an error.

I have combined the 2 outer ways into one, added the tags to that outer way and then deleted the relation. This is simpler than the relation.

Looks like a 'no'.

I have deleted the added ways that have no tags - and added the existing ways that are tagged as road in there place. I have deleted the duplicated bus stops .. and retagged 'stop_position' as 'platform'. I have placed the bus stops at the front of the relation and the ways at the rear - all in sequence. I have corrected the roles in the relation. Over 100 objects deleted.

This might fix it. Might.

When do you plan on repairing the broken PTv2 bus relations you have broken? There are 8 presently ...

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=151.19485&lat=-33.63775&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=149.07456&lat=-35.06379&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes

Hi,
The park multipolygon relation ... has an error.
The outer ways cannot share segments.
I have deleted the relation and tagged both ways as leisure=park.

Those warnings that id gives you .. are possible problems that you should look at fixing before you upload the data ... e.g.
"warnings:mismatched_geometry:unclosed_multipolygon_part" is a park relation that has been broken by this changeset. Sometimes the warnings are wrong.. in this case it was correct.

Partially reverted to restore residential relation/7609253

Partially reverted to restore residential relation/7609253

The removal of way/532084501 brakes the residential relation ...

Probably the removal of the other 3 ways also brakes the residential relation...
Partially reverted to restore residential relation/7609253

natural=wood on a node???

Is this a single tree - then used natural=tree...

relation/17296397 is NOT an island. Deleted.

This area is already mapped with wetlands, rivers etc... Please do not harm work already done by others.

Hi
Muiltipolygon relation/17269480 (garden) does not meet the 'rules' - duplicated segment. As this only has outers .. why does it need to be a relation at all???

I have placed the relevant tags on the outer ways, and then deleted the relation... Job done.

Unfortunately, with no answer as to the question of copyright clearance and mistakes in other changesets, I am inclined to revert this and other changesets using this source.

Can we have some response???

The question as to the copyright status of the source of this and other changesets has not been answered - see changeset/146167821
The answer should be provided with some haste.

This route is not compliant with PTv2 requirements. See @Warin61/diary/45106