Hi,

Welcome to OSM!

Some hints?
relation/16309539 - multipolygon (shop) makes no sense.

First a multipolygon relation must make a closed area.

Next the tag shop=yes does not convey much information.
I have deleted this.

relation/16309540 'Centre Pharmacy' ... That does not need to be a relation. I have made it a simple way. The 'name' looks to be a 'description' rather than a name? See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

And finally ... buildings don't go inside buildings... The shopping center is the outside of the building, the others are contained within the single building. The OSM guide is 'one feature = one OSM entry' .. note the word guide.. it is broken from time to time.

Hi,
Is this another 'gated community'???

These keep cropping up .. I expect the QA tools think these are 'locational' rather than 'postal'...

I have placed a few in order .. but deleted many as I cannot be bothered to correct all of them.

A)
oneway=yes with maxspeed:forward or maxspeed:backward .. that is not logical

B)
maxspeed:forward equals maxspeed:backward, just use maxspeed instead.

There maybe more of these logical types of errors..

There are warning messages about these max speed tags.

As these are unable to be checked I will delete them.

Hi,
The OSM guide is "one feature = one OSM entry"

The Intercontinental Hotel had 2 entries - one as a node the other as a relation. I have removed the node entry while placing the additional tags on the relation.

Hi,
I have altered this.

Relation outer ways cannot touch .. so a relation does not work here.

The church building now has the tags that were on the relation - service times syntax corrected.
The other building simply tagged building=yes.

Think that should do?

HI,

The bus stops are in the wrong order for relation16246834 Strathfield Connector Blue route (Cave Rd - Wallis Ave).

Hi,

addr:street should have the same capitalization as the associated highway, in this case "Guinea Street" not "Guinea street"

Hi
relation/16248772 has a number of issues:
tagged as both sand and grass??? Chose one, Looks like grass to me, so landuse=grass and remove the sand and other grass taggs.

The outer way crosses and inner... that is an error see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.00120&lat=-32.73891&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

It is 'showing up' when people try to make a map from it - detected address to road name differences.
Might be a good idea to put a comment on these about it being a gated community with a common address?

Hi,
The university building numbers look like ref=* numbers - not address numbers.

Hi,
Along with the house number the address also would require the street name - addr:street=???

Hi,
This changed a road name from Myrtle Creek Road to Cluan Tiers Road. There are a number of buildings carrying the address of Myrtle Creek Road at the south eastern section of this road. Possibly the road should be split into 2??? If so, where?

HI
There are addresses along "Pine Mountain Close" that have addr:street=Mcgahan Street .. that looks to be a conflict??? And OSM names the street "McGahan Street"

I have placed a note on the address concerned.

Hi
Under 'Public Transport version 2' routes ... the stops must be in the correct order from 'start' to 'finish' .. the same order as the ways are.

As such the introduction of the stop/platform 'Parramatta North Carpark' is not in the correct order.

I leave this for you to fix.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=151.02207&lat=-33.80826&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes

Hi,
way/1202238830 for building house is 'not very good' ...
First the JOSM validator would have given you a warning that 2 nodes were duplicates of each other.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.62249&lat=-33.44073&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

These can be merged into one node without loss of data.
Second the DCS Imagery would have given you better imagery to better map the house.

I leave this for you to look at.

Abbreviations should not have been used e.g "Mt Crosby Road" should have been "Mount Crosby Road"...

Hi
Some of these address don't match the adjacent road names ???

Bus route M92 to Sutherland set back to Public Transport version 1 as it does not comply with version 2 requirements.