please respond, I would really like to know if this is a accidental duplicate of the existing (tagged with more information) node.

while some of the changes made in 143992462 are correct it made two mistakes, the first being the removal of way/1178243253 which is there on the latest imagery and can be seen on the Bing street side available in iD.and as for the sidewalks I reverted the ones that I did because bicycle=Not Specified is non standard and from what I can tell from taginfo the ways that this commit added it to are the only occurrences globally. this tag from what I can tell adds nothing since unless otherwise specified it is implied that bicycles are allowed to use sidewalks (or any other pedestrian use) so bicycle=Not Specified and bicycle=yes mean the same thing and bicycle=yes is standardso it should be used. I also left multiple comments on the commit asking for clarification and the commiter was unresponsive providing no evidence that way/1178243253 was removed so I have to assume that was a mistake becuase bassed on the other vaialbe street side and satalite imagery this road seems to hav been added within the last few years so it would make no sense for it to have been removed so quickly.

(could not fit the complete explanation in the change set comment so adding here)

I tried contacting you through this commit multiple times and you have been unresponsive. I have to assume the removal of way/1178243253 was a mistake because it can be seen on several of the satellite imagery available in iD and the Bing street side also available in iD. I also reverted the bicycle=Not Specified because it is non standard and from what I can tell from taginfo what you added is the only occurrences globally. this tag from what I can tell adds nothing since unless otherwise specified it is implied that bicycles are allowed to use sidewalks (or any other pedestrian use) so bicycle=Not Specified and bicycle=yes would mean the same thing and bicycle=yes is standard.

changeset/144641870

as mentioned in the comments above google data cannot be used so this has to be reverted.

changeset/144640780

the imagery layers provided in iD () along with all the other default data sources in iD are ok since they have been checked. as for external data sources see osm.wiki/United_States/Resources and osm.wiki/Potential_datasources/Local_data#U.S. have more information . As mentioned previously for very simple edits something like StreetComplete and Every Door are best (or GoMap on iOS osm.wiki/Go_Map!!). if all of that is to complex you can just leave notes with the information (putting in the note all the information that needs to be added like speed limits for example) based on what you see with your own eyes (basic surveying essentially). essentially you can use the above mentioned mobile editors to map what you see with your own two eyes on the street, like a physical speed limit sign or leave a note based on what you see irl.

If am understanding correctly that what your latest comment says that means you used google as a source so this commit must thus be reverted, you dont have to worry about any of that I'll fix that in a second.

can you please respond as to weather or not you saw with your own eyes that
way way/1178243253 was demolished just over a year after it was built and since the latest satellite imagery was taken roughly 7 months ago based on my estimates.

can you please respond as to weather or not the source=google is correct because if it so then action needs to be taken to fix that.

Ok then, from your description I agree, your obviously the one with more knowledge on this so if you think this is the best we can do then so be it.
Happy mapping.

what is this "Accessibility and accommodation" standard you seem to refer to multiple times? also again the disused tagging would from the change set comment seem to better tagging for this, if you are primarily interested in mapping historical objects while OSM has allot of tagging for that from my understanding https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ is better for that.

also looking at it again opening_hours=NONE seems non standard and has as exemplified by the excessively low counts and 0.00% counts on taginfo (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/opening_hours#values)(https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/api/4/key/values?key=opening_hours&filter=all&lang=en&sortname=count&sortorder=desc&rp=24&page=1&query=NONE), due to this I would recommend either removing this (implied with the above mentioned disused tagging id think) or on the wiki find a better tagging schema to use, see opening_hours=*

wouldn't disused:*=* be better tagging for this feature based on the change set comment? something like disused:shop=mall.

Then wouldn’t the following 3 tags better describe it?:
building=office
osm.wiki/Tag%3Aoffice%3Dcompany
company=aerospace
.Honestly I don’t know, I just feel that building=commercial in a way is a bit to broad and we can be a it more specific with the tagging, though if you feel (since your the one with the in depth local knowledge it seems) that their isn’t any more specific tagging possible then so be it.

sorry forgot to link building=university in the previous comment.

for way way/1052424905 wouldn't building=university be a better tag, I've never been there, I'm asking purely off of the name here.

first of all, welcome to OSM, as for "Do you have an easier method?" if your talking about iD, it is one of the simpler editors all together, the only simpler ones are for mobile (StreetComplete osm.wiki/StreetComplete and Every Door osm.wiki/Every_Door). from my knowledge iD is the simplest on desktop. There is one last point here, we are legally not allowed to use google as a source since their data is proprietary and we dont have the right to bring it into OSM, especially because OSM is licensed as ODbL and google is proprietary and they haven't given us the express rights to use their data. so from my understanding this commit is in violation of all of that.

again, it would be wonderfull if you could please elaborate on why you removed way way/1178243253.

sorry typo "public storage"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144449963

also that removed way is also on the "Esri World Imagery" Ariel imagery and several others so unless this has changed over the last year I doubt that way/1178243253 is no longer there

again, can you please respond, my biggest worry is that the deletion of way/1178243253 is incorrect and I would like to figure this out ASAP.

I have a quick question?
is this the Doral Transit(DT) or Miami Dade Transit (MDT) bus stop, since that is already mapped, if it is for a transit provider other than those two, which is it so that it can be clarified in the tagging of the bus stop.

if you have any questions you can just just respond as a comment here or as a message to me through the "Send Message" link on my user profile when logged in (@Udarian).
otherwise happy mapping.