the project I would like created on the OSMUS tasking manager would be within the following geojson file https://github.com/Udarthegreat/public-sources/blob/b5bc9dc02fed82c7da24ebf8f17648053da34635/tasking%20manager/pedestrian%20feature%20addition%201/area%20for%20sidewalks.geojson
I am still working on road alingnments, and will needed around a week or two to finish, alignments below US 1v South Dixie Highway, I have been actively working on that over the last few weeks.

based on the website provided I would say that the bridges of Okeechobee shouldn't be connected directly to Hialeah Gardens Boulevard as you currently have it, that intersection is on a bridge. I did a preliminary ix but I would like y'all to look over and that ensure it is correct.

I am pretty sure that the Domino park has not closed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%A1ximo_G%C3%B3mez_Park

I do not see the ALPR on the streetside imagery so I was wondering what your source is for this. Also generally I don't think that these should be placed as a vertex in the middle of a road.

how do you add so meany translations in one go; do you really know over 50 languages from very different parts of the world.

please respond

short_name is supposed to be used for acronyms and other less obvious shortening, essentially is should a name that couldn't just be converted from a list of known shortcodes; so the use of short_name in this commit is incorrect. for more info see short_name=*#When_to_use .
I have fixed the error.

happy mapping,
Udar.

please respond

a few issues here, first of all as it is right now this is just a point with out an amenity of other identifying tag, this is an issue as those are required to make an item in OSM useful. The closest I can think of is a non profit office but that is iffy.
Second, I doubt that such a feature would be located in the middle of a school.
Third, you certainly should not have attached it to the vertex of the running track area.
You also have several dragged nodes in this commit.

The question becomes what is this feature supposed to be, because I have a feeling OSM doesn't currently have a tag for this, but we may be able to come up with something if you provide more info as a response.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

can you please give the geometry of way/39348297 another look as I doubt the angle at the end there is correct.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

please stop with these as previously requested changeset/169617044

please stop with these as previously requested changeset/169617044

Thank you, it does seem like a large parking lot, to be completely honest I expected this to become a residential area but I guess not.

please stop with these as previously requested changeset/169617044

While I agree that 1916775 was overly complicated and I fixed it I do not agree with the rest, I personally find multipolygons easier to maintain and deal with for land use then areas, plus it minimizes the amount of duplicate faces in the land use. I will deal with any breakages my self. I will ensure that I check tools like osmi more often to check for these kinds of issues.

please stop doing the tasks below Dolphin Expressway (relation/192469) as the tasks between dolphin and US1 are going to be part of a task I have been working of creating for like 8 months now and the allot of the roads south of US 1 are not properly alignment yet and once pedestrian is added to an area it becomes at minimum twice as time consuming and complicated to fix road alignments, so please stop doing these.

When I try to view the file it tells me I don’t have access to it.

I have some issues with this, while I agree with the access changes, and I can't believe that I missed the bicycle=not specified when it was added, what you did to the pedestrian features at Southwest 104th Street and Southwest 72nd Avenue is very incorrect in my opinion. The reason for this, is that I try to map Miami Dade's pedestrian infra to a silver tier of geometry, that is what that intersection what mapped to, for more info see osm.wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States/Pedestrian_Working_Group/Schemab . There is also the fact that crossings ways are only defined within the road area, mapping a crossing way into the sidewalk area is thus incorrect.

Thank you so much for the understanding,

Udar.

are you sure that these are service roads as this looks more like a residential development (last time I drove by (around a year ago)).

kerb vertexes should not be placed on sidewalk centerlines