can y'all do another pass through the pedestrian features in the area as after this changeset they are kind of rough in the area round the roads y'all changed and I cannot fix any of them as non of the aerial imagery sources in the area are up to date enough.

that's the whole issue, you replaced a parking=surface parking lot area with individual smaller areas, if you want to map the parking spaces, actually map the individual amenity=parking_space 's out, if you are not willing to do that do not split in this manner the correctly mapped parking areas.

next time please don't delete parking lots that are already mapped

next time please don't delete existing parking lots.

also unless there has been some recent construction in the area this is not within a building and most of the building surrounding seem to be apartments and other residential buildings so I am wondering if this is actually were this business is located.

happy mapping,
Udar

sidewalk:*=no is implied on highway=motorway_link.

sidewalk:*=no is implied on motorway's and motorway_link's.

The question is why did you add the source=https://maps.app.goo.gl/ZGkynDZNLDbRvtKa7 , was it as a kind of SEO or because that is were you got information about the business you added from?

we are not supposed to use google as a source for contributions as their license is incompatible with ours.

seems y'all were correct, and thank you for the prompt fix changeset in 170823353.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

the alignment of way way/11165237 seems off along with the crossing (or really lack of a crossing way) were it meets the sidewalk. Though this could just be the case as none of the available imagery in iD shows any of this.

I have manually reverted you changeset as, after a conversation with others on the OSMUS slack, and not getting anything back from you after multiple hours it seems that this changeset is SEO spam and thus it was undone.

Happy mapping,
Udar

as requested in changeset changeset/165714447 , has this started construction yet or not? I ask because from the website it seems like this hasn't ever broken ground yet so I don't think this is tagged correctly.

next time when you add footpaths inside of a park please connect them to the wider network so that you are not forming a pedestrian navigation island.

after bringing this up on the open street map us slack I agree that it may be useful to add these in multiple changesets and without all of the tags, I just hope that you continue to add the rest of the trees in Fairchild to OSM and please ensure that what you are adding is actually there in the latest imagery

https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C2VJAJCS0/p1755002235030229

happy mapping,
Udar

there are trees added in this changeset that are in the middle of water and some that are not there on the latest imagery (bing aerial). There is also the fact that, from what I can tell you have in meany parts of the gardens added only a subsection of the trees in the area so it might be better to do some of these as areas. I would not be against utra micro mapping out every individual tree in the main part of Fairchild but if that is to be done, it should be aligned correctly to the bing or "Esri World Imagery" and every tree should be added, along with adding `leaf_type`, `species`, `species:wikidata`, `leaf_cycle` and `denotation` tags to each.
This comment also applies to changeset/170331276.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

looking further into the business shop=sunglasses seems to be correct, the only website I could find for this business was on the mall website https://shopdolphinmall.com/stores/just-one-look-fashion-eyewear

next time can you please add a changeset comment describing what you have done. the comment for this changeset need only be something like "added gate". for more info see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

I tagged this one as glasses because they didn't seem to do eye exams, they seemed to only sell designer sunglasses. This can sort of be seen in the panoramax image linked.

I created a geojson with the area that I still need to realign roads in currently https://github.com/Udarthegreat/public-sources/blob/5824ca8437aebaa5f0ab31fad5e3f0de3e0489b8/other/area%20road%20todo.geojson