what is this "Accessibility and accommodation" standard you seem to refer to multiple times? also again the disused tagging would from the change set comment seem to better tagging for this, if you are primarily interested in mapping historical objects while OSM has allot of tagging for that from my understanding https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ is better for that.

also looking at it again opening_hours=NONE seems non standard and has as exemplified by the excessively low counts and 0.00% counts on taginfo (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/opening_hours#values)(https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/api/4/key/values?key=opening_hours&filter=all&lang=en&sortname=count&sortorder=desc&rp=24&page=1&query=NONE), due to this I would recommend either removing this (implied with the above mentioned disused tagging id think) or on the wiki find a better tagging schema to use, see opening_hours=*

wouldn't disused:*=* be better tagging for this feature based on the change set comment? something like disused:shop=mall.

Then wouldn’t the following 3 tags better describe it?:
building=office
osm.wiki/Tag%3Aoffice%3Dcompany
company=aerospace
.Honestly I don’t know, I just feel that building=commercial in a way is a bit to broad and we can be a it more specific with the tagging, though if you feel (since your the one with the in depth local knowledge it seems) that their isn’t any more specific tagging possible then so be it.

sorry forgot to link building=university in the previous comment.

for way way/1052424905 wouldn't building=university be a better tag, I've never been there, I'm asking purely off of the name here.

first of all, welcome to OSM, as for "Do you have an easier method?" if your talking about iD, it is one of the simpler editors all together, the only simpler ones are for mobile (StreetComplete osm.wiki/StreetComplete and Every Door osm.wiki/Every_Door). from my knowledge iD is the simplest on desktop. There is one last point here, we are legally not allowed to use google as a source since their data is proprietary and we dont have the right to bring it into OSM, especially because OSM is licensed as ODbL and google is proprietary and they haven't given us the express rights to use their data. so from my understanding this commit is in violation of all of that.

again, it would be wonderfull if you could please elaborate on why you removed way way/1178243253.

sorry typo "public storage"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144449963

also that removed way is also on the "Esri World Imagery" Ariel imagery and several others so unless this has changed over the last year I doubt that way/1178243253 is no longer there

again, can you please respond, my biggest worry is that the deletion of way/1178243253 is incorrect and I would like to figure this out ASAP.

I have a quick question?
is this the Doral Transit(DT) or Miami Dade Transit (MDT) bus stop, since that is already mapped, if it is for a transit provider other than those two, which is it so that it can be clarified in the tagging of the bus stop.

if you have any questions you can just just respond as a comment here or as a message to me through the "Send Message" link on my user profile when logged in (@Udarian).
otherwise happy mapping.

also added new roundabout based on latest imagery

sorry didnt mean to add the last part, my bad, what I meant to put it:

next time you commit try to keep you commits in various areas local (restrained to one geographic area like a city or town) as to keep the geographic area down, this makes it easier to review.

2 points here, first, please next time try to keep you commits in various areas local (restrained to one geographic area like a city or town) as to keep the geographic area down, this makes it easier to review. Also please next time provide a change set comment describing what was done in the commit, for more information see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more details.

so, just to make sure we understand each other here; the edits on this commit (143823733) were good and should have been kept (I have since fixed the fact that this was reverted in a commit of my own), I had no issue with that. the only issue was with the fact that the change set comment (comment)=* inaccurately described what was done in the commit, thats it.

2 points here, first, please next time try to keep you commits in various areas local (restrained to one geographic area like a city or town) as to keep the geographic area down, this makes it easier to review. Also please next time provide a change set comment describing what was done in the commit, for more information see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more details.

I was not pointing out "improper modifications", just that the comment=* could have been better.

I dont know if I was misunderstood, it is preferable for the traffic_signals to be at the lines on the roads were the cars should stop, what this commit actually did was correct, my original message on this commit was to do with the change set comment on this.
I felt that "Added Stop Sign." does not properly describe what was done in the commit and was simply pointing out that something like "Updated Traffic Signals" would have better described what was done.
in short, my issue with the commit was not with the contents but to do with osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

sorry, bad change set comment, updated alignment of sidewalks based on newer imagery