Looking at the video linked in the change set comment it seams the from way way/87553350 to node node/11417293763 on way way/38840376 it is closed and under construction since that seems to correspond to the part of the highway shown in red in the video. So to me that implies it should be tagged as such.

A few notes here:
It seams you just removed all the bicycle=designated and bicycle=yes but left the segregated=no which together mean that the you can ride your bike down that sidewalk/footpath but there is no segregation between the normal pedestrian and bike traffic, segregated=no means nothing without bicycle=designated and bicycle=yes. As a note I see no reason to remove those tags in the first place, so the question becomes why did you do so, because from my understanding those tags should stay, so please add them back.

The second point is that in one of the residential areas you changed the access on a foot path from motor_vehicle=no to motor_vehicle=private which would imply that private vehicles are allowed on that pedestrian foot path, this seems illogical thus I assume this is a mistake, please fix this, also I assume in that same residential area horses are not allowed so horse=private should be brought back to horse=no .

In general please stop removing bicycle=yes from public sidewalks and other footpaths.

Wouldn’t that mean that ways such as way/992722249 would now need to be tagged using the construction tagging?

again busses are the only form of traffic allowed on these ways so this commit is incorrect

this is incorrect, busses are the only vehicles aloud on ways
way/807636696
way/807656900
way/807636695
so they are busways.

Follow up, I didn’t check the stuff in Colombia but the stuff up north when I zoomed in on a way this individual added in this commit and the other commit by this user and went into iD none of the imagery showed and lakes, rivers, roads etc were this user added them or on any part of the island, so it seams like at least some of this is vandalism unless allot has happened since the satellite imagery last updated. What makes it even more suspect is the fact that allot of the names are just descriptors like big lake etc. and and amusement park which I doubt would exists that far north.

By looking at the ways touched by this commit it seams like the user made some edits in Colombia, then made some edits on Brock Island without committing between doing changes to the two areas. I doubt that they have local knowledge in Brock Island due to the fact that they added a lake ( way/1231443750 ) called lago grandis which seems to be in Spanish which while possible I doubt that a lake in Canada would have a Spanish name. Also because of the aforementioned ways name it seems they may have just called it big lake which I also doubt is the actual name. This is just speculation so take this with a grain of salt, someone with local knowledge of Brock island should check that if at all possible.

Question?
Why did you change the name of most of the name:*=* when according to the change set comment you should only have added/edited the name:chr (from my understanding that’s the code for cherokee) it seams unless you know, in some cases somewhere around 60 ' odd languages. Also I’m sure there’s a good reason the Bahamas is called the Bahamas, I ask because you seem to have changed the name:en from “The Bahamas” to “Bahamas”.

Next please try and keep your changes sets geographic area down by committing changes to one area (a part of town etc) before you move on and make changes to another. This makes it easier to review change sets and leads to less clutter on the history view on the OSM website. Have a wonderful day.

also ways:
way/38840050/
and
way/38840051/
seem to not be there on what imagery we do have in iD.

I was wondering if you could also check your sources and see if the following ways are still under construction:
way/49238754
way/943857975/
way/1228196958/
way/1228196959/
way/1228196957
. I wouldn't normally ask, its just that all the sources we have on the default instance of iD are out dated enough that I am not sure what completed and what isnt along with the status of all the construction and cannot currently survey their statuses currently so I was wondering if your sources (which seem to be relatively more up to date then those I have access to) showed anything different there or changes to roadway geometries that I cannot yet tell from the sources I have access to. again sorry for the random comment, I have no issue with this commit at all I was just hopping that a similar commit expanding the data on the other side of Delphine Expressway could also be done, I'm just asking for some help from a fellow mapper.

but from my understanding the previous tagging seems to be the best we have so it shoulnt have been removed, there will not always be a tag or set of tags that 100% correctly describes a feature but amenity=* , office=* etc. tagging is always necessary otherwise the data is useless due data consumers not being able to use it.
this seems to be a honest mistake/misunderstanding of tagging norms in OSM. I am going to bring it back to what it was previously.

please respond, I would really like to know if this is a accidental duplicate of the existing (tagged with more information) node.

while some of the changes made in 143992462 are correct it made two mistakes, the first being the removal of way/1178243253 which is there on the latest imagery and can be seen on the Bing street side available in iD.and as for the sidewalks I reverted the ones that I did because bicycle=Not Specified is non standard and from what I can tell from taginfo the ways that this commit added it to are the only occurrences globally. this tag from what I can tell adds nothing since unless otherwise specified it is implied that bicycles are allowed to use sidewalks (or any other pedestrian use) so bicycle=Not Specified and bicycle=yes mean the same thing and bicycle=yes is standardso it should be used. I also left multiple comments on the commit asking for clarification and the commiter was unresponsive providing no evidence that way/1178243253 was removed so I have to assume that was a mistake becuase bassed on the other vaialbe street side and satalite imagery this road seems to hav been added within the last few years so it would make no sense for it to have been removed so quickly.

(could not fit the complete explanation in the change set comment so adding here)

I tried contacting you through this commit multiple times and you have been unresponsive. I have to assume the removal of way/1178243253 was a mistake because it can be seen on several of the satellite imagery available in iD and the Bing street side also available in iD. I also reverted the bicycle=Not Specified because it is non standard and from what I can tell from taginfo what you added is the only occurrences globally. this tag from what I can tell adds nothing since unless otherwise specified it is implied that bicycles are allowed to use sidewalks (or any other pedestrian use) so bicycle=Not Specified and bicycle=yes would mean the same thing and bicycle=yes is standard.

changeset/144641870

as mentioned in the comments above google data cannot be used so this has to be reverted.

changeset/144640780

the imagery layers provided in iD () along with all the other default data sources in iD are ok since they have been checked. as for external data sources see osm.wiki/United_States/Resources and osm.wiki/Potential_datasources/Local_data#U.S. have more information . As mentioned previously for very simple edits something like StreetComplete and Every Door are best (or GoMap on iOS osm.wiki/Go_Map!!). if all of that is to complex you can just leave notes with the information (putting in the note all the information that needs to be added like speed limits for example) based on what you see with your own eyes (basic surveying essentially). essentially you can use the above mentioned mobile editors to map what you see with your own two eyes on the street, like a physical speed limit sign or leave a note based on what you see irl.

If am understanding correctly that what your latest comment says that means you used google as a source so this commit must thus be reverted, you dont have to worry about any of that I'll fix that in a second.

can you please respond as to weather or not you saw with your own eyes that
way way/1178243253 was demolished just over a year after it was built and since the latest satellite imagery was taken roughly 7 months ago based on my estimates.

can you please respond as to weather or not the source=google is correct because if it so then action needs to be taken to fix that.

Ok then, from your description I agree, your obviously the one with more knowledge on this so if you think this is the best we can do then so be it.
Happy mapping.