Osmose on its own is not a source. What change did you actually make?

What source did you use for the change to way/823065235/history ?

Thanks

I've remapped this using "pitch=line" in way/1026721836 .
IF time permits later I'll try and add rendering for "pitch=line" to map.atownsend.org.uk .
An issue to discuss that at OSM's "standard" map is at https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1126 , although the suggested approach there is different.

Also joined a pedestrian/bike crossing to the main road neat Kingsholm based on Bing/Maxar imagery, and trimmed off another spur in Leamington.

Also a flood prone bit off Sutton Road

Thanks

Hello,
Thanks for adding the "cycle path" routes on NCN 55 here. I just wanted to check that some of the extra spurs and routes were all OK. Currently it looks like relation/37734#map=18/53.39598/-2.07783 and previously it was like https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1grh . Presumably cyclists would use the cycle path noth of the A626 and then cross the road, rather than connecting on to Dale Road?
I noticed because relation/37734 increased from 39 pieces to 45, which is an unusually large jump. I suspect that it's explained by the changes here, and at the junctions to the west, but wondered if perhaps some spurs, such as the eastern part of way/1029358950 , should be part of it. Let me know if you'd like to trim off any bits.
Best Regards,
Andy

Some time before yesterday, Orkney Islands (375982) was no longer a valid multipolygon. The top of way/667624097 and way/1034600196 intersect.

See also osm.org/user_blocks/5716 .

Hello,
Who is the "we" in " trips we build on this route"?
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks - I've moved some ways from the superroute to relation/9476067#map=15/52.6482/1.2473 to fill in the gap here.

I've re-added 71973 to 60199 in changeset/117770416 . Hopefully that completes the revert here. https://osm.virtuelle-loipe.de/history/ suggests 1319 amd 1321 are the same.

For info, I've removed way/40501080 from NCN1 / EV12 (which completed what it looks like you were trying to do.
NCN1 is now relation/75894#map=17/52.64461/1.24628&layers=N
EV12 is now relation/9476067#map=15/52.6454/1.2478 - should EV12 have this gap filled in, or is EV12 defined elsewhere is containing all of this bit of NCN1?

@jomox Thanks - I actually tried "mapki" first but that didn't like the large number of versions

@Dev_Kittenz This isn't the first time you have been warned about this - osm.org/user_blocks/5459 .
@Larmax , thanks for fixing.

The change to https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/71973 has been undone in changeset/117716012 .
Although a new version of Ukraine was uploaded here, https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/relation/60199 suggests no change.
See comments on changeset/117715070 .

Please do not make changes to admin_levels without wider discussion - the main "talk" mailing list is a good place to start, but also include local communities too. https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf explains how OSM tries to handle these situations more generally.
Also a changeset comment of "Added DPRfarmland" (and the subsequent one "fix") is VERY misleading.

لتجنب الشك ، فإن عبارة "لم تتم الموافقة عليها من قبل السلطات الرسمية" لا علاقة لها بـ OpenStreetMap. إذا اعتقد الناس الذين يعيشون هناك أن هذا هو الاسم ، فهذا هو الاسم.

For the avoidance of doubt, " not approved by the official authorities" is irrelevant to OpenStreetMap. If people living there think that that is the name, it's the name.