See discussion of this change on changeset/117434185 and https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/2374762 for the full story of tag changes here.

In changeset/117437091 I've removed alt_name:ar and set name:ar back to the version from changeset/107272257 which better represents the current political and geographical situation.

For the avoidance of doubt - this place has _never_ been a country in OSM. It has always been admin level 3, representing a disuted territory.
However, here you have changed the alt_name:ar from an Arabic name to an English one, which is clearly rubbish.
You have been warned before (see osm.org/user_blocks/1194 ) not to make sensitive changes without discussion.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

I haven't seen Victoria Vaults open but it's in all the local gig guides again and the blackboard outside is updated so I assume it is.

Hello,
Just checking - is Cote open again now? I think so, based on what it looked like when I last walked past it, but wanted to check with you as you've updated it recently. It still has "opening_hours:covid19 = closed" set.
Best Regards,
Andy

Being discussed on talk-gb at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2022-February/028659.html .

"pitch=line" has been used: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1g6k but there isn't widespread support of that.

@Central America Please don't do this! In no way could relation/13747535 be though of as a "pitch" The actual pitch is the area of the tennis court. See leisure=pitch#Tennis_court . If you'd like to add the lines, try asking on the tagging list - I'm sure it's been discussed previously.

The amount of brown earth behind the "wickets" on the Maxar imagery doesn't really fit with a cricket pitch, but I've no idea what it might be.

Hello,
I've added way/1026379458 back to relation/10410519 so that it matches how it was before - https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1g1Q - hope this is OK.
I've also filled in the gap in Moor Lane that had appeared: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1g1R .
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
If node/8811781823/history is actually a "zero_waste" shop you might want to add a "zero_waste=yes" or "zero_waste=only" tag to it.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
If node/7533297946 is actually a "zero_waste" shop you might want to add a "zero_waste=yes" or "zero_waste=only" tag to it.
Best Regards,
Andy

Yes - no problem - will do!

Hei Muukkaaja,

Toivottavasti et pahastu, kun kysyn 9 vuoden takaisesta muokkauksesta. Lisäsit tähän muutossarjaan "source=google street view" -tunnisteen solmuun node/376824623/history . Emme voi varsinaisesti käyttää sitä lähteenä OSM:ssä, koska Googlen lisenssi ei salli sen käyttöä täällä - se aiheuttaisi todellisia ongelmia projektille, jos meidän todetaan käyttävän Google Mapsia lähteenä.
Jos tämä on sinulle tuttu paikka, "source=local_knowledge" olisi täysin OK.

Parhain terveisin
Andy Townsend, OSM:n tietotyöryhmän puolesta

Hello Muokkaaja,

I hope you don't mind me asking about an edit from 9 years ago. On this changeset you added a "source=google street view" tag on the node node/376824623/history . We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source.
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

Ahoj piráte21,

Doufám, že vám nevadí, že se ptám na úpravu z doby před 8 lety. Do této sady změn jste přidali značku „source=Google“ do uzlu node/2344317894/history . Nemůžeme to ve skutečnosti použít jako zdroj v OSM, protože licence Google to zde neumožňuje – způsobilo by to projektu skutečné problémy, kdybychom zjistili, že jako zdroj používáme Mapy Google.
Pokud je to někde, které znáte, pak by „source=local_knowledge“ bylo naprosto v pořádku.

S pozdravem
Andy Townsend, jménem OSM's Data Working Group

Hello pirat21,

I hope you don't mind me asking about an edit from 8 years ago. On this changeset you added a "source=Google" tag on the node node/2344317894/history . We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source.
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

Hallo StefanB68,

Ich hoffe, Sie haben nichts dagegen, wenn ich nach einer Bearbeitung von vor 9 Jahren frage. In diesem Änderungssatz haben Sie ein „source=Google“-Tag auf dem Knoten node/1902217632/history hinzugefügt. Wir können das eigentlich nicht als Quelle in OSM verwenden, weil die Google-Lizenz es nicht erlaubt, es hier zu verwenden – es würde echte Probleme für das Projekt verursachen, wenn wir Google Maps als Quelle verwenden würden.
Wenn dies ein Ort ist, mit dem Sie vertraut sind, wäre "source=local_knowledge" vollkommen in Ordnung.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Andy Townsend, im Namen der Data Working Group von OSM

Hello StefanB68,

I hope you don't mind me asking about an edit from 9 years ago. On this changeset you added a "source=Google" tag on the node node/1902217632/history . We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source.
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group

Witaj Mikikiki,

Mam nadzieję, że nie masz nic przeciwko, że pytam o edycję sprzed 7 lat. W tym zestawie zmian dodałeś tag „source=Google” w węźle node/3012088324 . W rzeczywistości nie możemy użyć tego jako źródła w OSM, ponieważ licencja Google nie pozwala na użycie go tutaj – spowodowałoby to prawdziwe problemy dla projektu, gdybyśmy odkryli, że używamy Google Maps jako źródła.
Jeśli jest to miejsce, które znasz, wtedy „source=local_knowledge” byłoby w porządku.

Z poważaniem
Andy Townsend, w imieniu Grupy Roboczej ds. Danych OSM