OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
117555302 almost 4 years ago

Please don't "delete everything and remap" - it is far too easy to forget something.

14044437 almost 4 years ago

There are quite a few others, including but not limited to:

<tag k="source" v="Google street view"/>
node/2034657935
<tag k="source" v="Google street view"/>
node/2034657941
<tag k="source" v="Google street view"/>
node/2034657922
<tag k="source" v="Google street view"/>
node/2034657944
<tag k="source" v="Google street view"/>
node/2034684470
<tag k="source" v="Google street view"/>
node/2034684487
<tag k="source" v="Google street view;MML2012"/>
way/192934768
<tag k="source" v="Google street view"/>
node/2034684470

Are you sure that you did not use "Google Street View" for any of them and just happened to type that in as a source "by accident"?

113008604 almost 4 years ago

(prompted to come here by the help question)
The relevant OSM wiki page is osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element - essentially you wouldn't add 2 things in OSM for one thing in the real world. However, that page doesn't say that a patch of water can't be part of 2 larger sea areas - the bits of harbour here obviously are bits of harbour, but they're also part of the larger fjord.

117602778 almost 4 years ago

The only changes here were at the far northeast and southwest ends of this box.

112717096 almost 4 years ago

Thanks!

112717096 almost 4 years ago

Hello,
Are way/994072710 and way/994072711 really part of relation/2382950#map=15/50.4389/-4.7598 ? They look like an od outlier.
Best Regards,
Andy

117496578 almost 4 years ago

For completeness, relation/937230#map=13/51.7836/-1.4928&layers=C in Witney is very much _proposed_, and (following discussions on IRC with people who know about such things) is a reasonable route that NCN57 might be allowed to take through here. It probably isn't the cyclists' preferred route, but is perhaps the most likely one.

117450343 almost 4 years ago

Hello,
Thanks for deleting the "not a real path" here - it looked like it went straight over a cliff, which didn't look like a good idea at all!
Just one question - do you know how tje Ebor Way gets around it? You can see the gap at relation/370663#map=17/53.91698/-1.80719 . If not, never mind - I might get the chance to scout for signposts at some point.
Best Regards,
Andy

111310796 almost 4 years ago

Hello,
I'm guessing that the "highway=yes" tag on way/984089536 is an accident?
Best Regards,
Andy

116962327 almost 4 years ago

Apparently, https://www.instagram.com/explore/locations/704228086423911/Hotel%20Gaj%20Kesri/ has been updated to point to the right place...

116962327 almost 4 years ago

OK, Facebook say that they'll update the hotel in question (although I suspect it'll take a little while before that change appears in mobile apps), and they'll also think about how to better handle "Instagram reports" of the type you did above, and direct emails, which didn't work when I tried it a week ago.

116962327 almost 4 years ago

As well as emailing I did the 21st century equivalent of going around the back of the house and throwing small stones at a bedroom window to gain attention, which seems to have worked. Watch this space...

116962327 almost 4 years ago

I had no reply from Facebook so I've emailed them again. Unfortunately their lack of reply so far was not unexpected given my previous dealings with them as an organisation.

117469773 almost 4 years ago

Lots of boundaries use way/377155716 here but the 3 townland boundaries use way/377155595 and way/1031961783 so that the bridge and the river don't "join", and all are valid multipolygons.

117425143 almost 4 years ago

Perhaps a check with the reporter that you had actually fixed their problem would help prevent this sort of issue in the future?

117425143 almost 4 years ago

@Nadzeya_ , perhaps you could expand on exactly what "customer feedback" you received here that caused you to add buildings that had apparently been demolished years ago?

117442619 almost 4 years ago

Thanks - if it really exists, it makes sense to keep it.

117442619 almost 4 years ago

One more quick question - is the spur of the Ouse Valley Way up Church Street really there?

relation/165638#map=17/52.15045/-0.70085&layers=H

117286568 almost 4 years ago

Hello,
I wonder how the Ouse Valley Way connects across the gap at relation/165638#map=20/52.14873/-0.69659&layers=H ? Presumably the path from the west connects to the northwest end of the bridge and not directly to the fence?
Best Regards,
Andy

117335165 almost 4 years ago

Hello,
I wondered if you had any idea how the Dales Way Link got across the gap at relation/5352963#map=17/53.91551/-1.80077 ?
Best Regards,
Andy