Hello,
I just noticed way/832558722/history here - it looks very odd. It doesn't join at either end, so no-one can ever use it, and on the imagery it doesn't look anything like a service road.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello (and a belated welcome to OpenStreetMap!),
I just noticed that way/792485687 has an "office=yes" tag on it, which seems a bit odd - what sort of office is it?
Best Regards,
Andy

For completeness, I've tried to contact Facebook on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
We've had similar discussions previously, which is why I was asking about what happens button by button earlier. I've mentioned this changeset discussion in the email.
- Andy

Als Korrektur halte ich das nicht für sehr sinnvoll - es ist unwahrscheinlich, dass eine Leiter mitten auf der Straße steht. Was dort wahrscheinlich ist, ist ein Leiterübertritt auf dem Fußweg.

As a correction, I don't think that this makes a lot of sense - there is unlikely to be a ladder in the middle of the road. What there probably is is a ladder stile on the footpath.

One other thing - the cycleway further south at way/1028660923 currently doesn't actually join Terminus Road. Presumably it does, so that routers can understand that you can get from one to the other?

Hello, a quick question about the cycleway here. Currently way/763299425 doesn't actually join Terminus Road (you can see that at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1fQD ) but a couple of days ago it did: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1fQE .
If you're cycling along NAtional Cycle Route 2 here, where does it actually join? relation/13725899#map=19/50.89742/-1.39740
Best Regards,
Andy

Looks updated to me. Maybe it's cached in your local browser?

Lower zoom levels might take a while to filter through, but higher zoom levels should update immediately.

Thanks. What other app was it that you were trying to get it into? Maybe we could work with them so that no-one feels to do this in the future.

Hola Marczoutenberg y bienvenido a OpenStreetMap,
Parece que este conjunto de cambios o uno anterior podría haber causado una pequeña brecha en el límite aquí; puede verlo en relation/5441968#map=10/27.5685/-8.8509 actualmente ( aunque estoy seguro de que se arreglará pronto).
¿Cuál fue el cambio que en realidad estabas tratando de hacer aquí?
Atentamente,
Andy

Hello Marczoutenberg and welcome to OpenStreetMap,
It looks like this changeset or a previous might have caused a bit of a gap in the boundary here - you can see that at relation/5441968#map=10/27.5685/-8.8509 currently (although I'm sure that will get fixed soon).
What was the change that you were actually trying to make here?
Best Regards,
Andy

Edit was fact-checked by someone with local knowledge(!)

The source here was "the only way to get from A to B" using the cycleway through the building works that someone's already mapped.

Hello g1750,
You've changed the road here from a secondary to a residential here - has the classification really changed?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
I'm not sure what way/1008076447 is here - I can't see a service road going around the edge of the car park here?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello jaywhyenecks,
I'm trying to understand why you've added way/945676607 etc. here as buildings. Was it just an accident or was there some set of instructions that you were following that suggested that you added a building here?
Best Regards
Andy

What happens if you tap "Report a problem with the map"?

What _exact message_ does Instagram give you?

However, while it isn't "wrong" to tag bicycle=no on foot-only infrastructure such as highway=footway it's generally been thought to be unnecessary.
I suspect - and I'd like to be proved wrong on this - is that someone's adding "bicycle=yes" (and "highway=cycleway") to things that really aren't, because they want to cycle there.

Where it isn't clear, I'd agree - I certainly tag foot and horse access as explicitly "yes" on public bridleways because an app developer in Germany or the US isn't going to understand the "designation=public_bridleway" tag. However, I think I actually tag such specific access more than most people do.