OpenStreetMap
SomeoneElse's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 110987034 | over 4 years ago | Tanks for tidying these up. I'm about 70% of the list of revert errors currently... |
| 111012882 | over 4 years ago | Tidying up after changeset/110823595#map=4/62.07/12.06&layers=H revert |
| 110879318 | over 4 years ago | Oops - I think that this (or maybe an edit previous to yours?) might have left some gaps in relation/10601794 . I've filled them in now. |
| 108296309 | over 4 years ago | Thanks - and thanks for fixing e.g. way/965846677 . |
| 108296309 | over 4 years ago | ... and ignore my 2 streetcomplete edits to it! |
| 108296309 | over 4 years ago | way/965846674#map=19/53.96218/-1.06914 Looks very wrong here - a nonexistent duplicate cycleway.
I suspect that the duplication might have been done by someone new to osm, and might need a friendly "hello and welcome" message as well |
| 110572864 | over 4 years ago | If you can do that before doing any other mapping that'd be great. |
| 110572864 | over 4 years ago | > Is there anywhere that also states banned sources? There is no "list of banned sources" since that is the wrong way around - we can only use sources whose licences explicitly allow us to. Google is explicitly mentioned at osm.wiki/Legal_FAQ#Can_I_trace_data_from_Google_Maps.2FNokia_Maps.2F....3F |
| 110572864 | over 4 years ago | I can't think of a really easy way beyond simply navigating through them at osm.org - osm.wiki/Quality_assurance has some, and in addition to those in with osm.wiki/Revert_scripts is a "download all changesets by a user" script (but you'd need to use something else to process/visualise them). |
| 110572864 | over 4 years ago | > I would have to go back through all 2,000 of my edits to try and locate maybe like 30 edits? If you have only used Google on some edits then yes, it will make sense to let us know on which edits that was. If you don't we'll have to assume that all previous edits are affected. |
| 110572864 | over 4 years ago | Sure, but we'll need to know which edits you used Google Street View for _at all_ . |
| 110572864 | over 4 years ago | > Hi, the sources I use are mainly Google Street View For the avoidance of doubt - we can't use Google Street View or other Google products as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. Can you let us know which changesets of yours have relied on Google as a source? We'll need to revert/redact those changes. You can comment here or email [email protected] . Best Regards, Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| 82355446 | over 4 years ago | I've added a zero_waste=yes tag to The Scoop Wholefoods (based on name and website). zero_waste=only may be more correct; maybe you know one way or the other? |
| 106086634 | over 4 years ago | I've added a zero_waste=yes tag to The Refill Larder (based on name and website). zero_waste=only may be more correct; perhaps you know whether that would be the case? |
| 110745024 | over 4 years ago | Also added website to "Scoop Wholefoods" |
| 107982035 | over 4 years ago | I've added a zero_waste=yes tag to Refill Therapy (based on https://www.govserv.org/GB/London-Borough-of-Hackney/139960572707734/Greener-Hackney). zero_waste=only may be more correct; maybe you know? |
| 85829397 | over 4 years ago | I've added a zero_waste=yes tag to "Refill And Go" (based on the name and the website). zero_waste=only may be more correct; not sure if you're a shopper there? |
| 110701749 | over 4 years ago | Hello DuhC0mmunity,
|
| 110658249 | over 4 years ago | The criteria isn't "does it have wikidata" (many, many things have wikidata but no Chinese name), but "does it have a Chinese name". It's reasonable to assume that all countries have a verifiable Chinese name (and a name in most other common languages) but not reasonable to assume that every hamlet or small town does.
|
| 110658249 | over 4 years ago | Hello,
|