OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
162737594 10 months ago

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

162736504 10 months ago

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

162736067 10 months ago

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

162818469 10 months ago

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

162736625 10 months ago

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

162736386 10 months ago

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

162795676 10 months ago

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

162795853 10 months ago

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

162736843 10 months ago

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

162819929 10 months ago

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

162737644 10 months ago

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

162795263 10 months ago

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see changeset/162736067 and osm.org/user_blocks/17316

163010013 10 months ago

Hello, do you mind if I ask a personal question - are you a human?

162979285 10 months ago

Thanks

162951932 10 months ago

Currently the relation relation/4283214 is just a line with one member way/317689837 ? I'm guessing that "Part of Ausestown" is not actually a thing but "Causestown" is?

162892444 10 months ago

I asked my friend "Eliza" for help and she suggested asking:

Is it because you have not got any links there is an unsuitable sign
which may found at the top end covering that you came to me?

162892444 10 months ago

What, exactly, does the sign say?

162578565 10 months ago

Following the complaint to the DWG Ticket#2025022210000194 and the discussion above, I've reverted this in changeset/162910810 .
To reiterate, I suspect that, based on the sources above _most_ OSM mappers (even ones like me who often map such infrastructure as part of the road) would map this as a separate cycleway.
If anyone would like to discuss this further I'd suggest doing so in a public forum such as https://community.openstreetmap.org (I can add a "lithuania" tag to any posts if so desired). Discussing there would be better than a private location or a mailing list that's had one post in 6 months.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

162892444 10 months ago

> There is also an "unsuitable..." sign at the top end

Is there? Can you link to a picture of it?

162892444 10 months ago

There may also be an "unsuitable..." sign at the top end covering way/46588460 and way/46588459 , but when I was last there the only signage was at the southeast.