Cześć, Andy z Data Working Group.
Po pierwsze, zasugerowałbym, aby wszyscy przenieśli tę dyskusję na forum (konkretny temat dotyczący tej edycji). Widzę, że są już tam ogólne dyskusje, takie jak https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/zniszczenie-mojej-pracy-nad-infrastruktura-rowerowa/125418 .
Po drugie, zasugerowałbym, aby ludzie zamieszczali zdjęcia faktycznej infrastruktury, aby zilustrować swój punkt widzenia.
Mapowanie ścieżek rowerowych i chodników nie jest kwestią „czarno-białą” — są chwile, kiedy ma sens mapowanie ich jako części infrastruktury drogowej, a są chwile, kiedy ma sens, aby były oddzielone od drogi (i faktycznie oddzielone od siebie). Tylko patrząc na aktualne zdjęcia, ludzie będą mogli zobaczyć, co tam jest.
Pozdrawiam,
Andy Townsend, w imieniu Data Working Group OSM.

Hello, Andy from the Data Working Group here.
Firstly, I'd suggest that everyone takes this this discussion to the forum (a specific topic about this edit). I can see that there are already general discussions there such as https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/zniszczenie-mojej-pracy-nad-infrastruktura-rowerowa/125418 .
Secondly, I'd suggest that people post pictures of the actual infrastructure to illustrate their point of view.
Mapping cycleways and footways isn't a "black and white" issue - there are times when it makes complete sense to map it as part of the road infrastructure, and times when it makes sense for them to be separate from the road (and indeed separate from each other). Only by looking at up to date pictures will people be able to see what is there.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Hello - I think that the new bit way/1363939186 needs adding to a couple of relations - relation/1695404#map=19/52.348209/-1.403282 shows the gap in one of them.
Best Regards,
Andy

Given that this sort of thing is of interest to lots of other people, I'd suggest a forum discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/ would be a really good idea. In French would be fine - other people can just hit the "translate" button.

Oops, looks like this got added in the middle of the Atlantic and someone had to delete it. Maybe "osmtree" should check that it has sensible lat and long before adding?

Hello again jajanja3 ,

Following on from changeset/161257413 , please do use changeset comments that actually explain what you have changed. "Navigation Detail" on its own does not really help anyone.

Thanks. Would it be possible to ensure that changesets have some reference to the actual maproulette task? Maproulette tasks tend to be of variable quality, and it's really useful to know which changesets resulted from which one.

Can you try replying to https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-bot-like-comments-on-changesets/126587/7 in the forum?

I've added two nodes, both of which have pictures:

node/12626336200 is an "Unsuitable for Motors" sign pointing south. There's a picture of the sign.

node/12626377501 is a place where there is _no_ sign on the track pointing east. There's a picture showing that there is no sign.

Does that answer your question?

Thanks!

I went in for a beer, and inside it was more like a pub than a bar.

There's no sign pointing east down Hambleton Road and Oldstead Bank. There is one pointing south down High Town Bank Road. See changeset/163067597 .

pssst: note/4645568#map=17/54.232161/-1.201329&layers=N

Ah, thanks.
Slack, obviously, is outside the control of OSMF for archiving for future reference etc., whereas the wiki (hopefully!) should be available for reference until the heat death of the universe...

Thank you. I still don't understand what you're asking here?
I was a shop. It closed. Then it opened again. Then it closed again. Then it opened again. There were at least 3 name changes along the way.

@ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy can you link to where the public discussion happened on c.osm.org?

You're not really explaining yourself very well. I've asked at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-bot-like-comments-on-changesets/126587 - perhaps you could post a comment there?

Hello jajanja3, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Following on from changeset/161257413 , please do use changeset comments that actually explain what you have changed. "Navigation Detail" on its own does not really help anyone.

Best Regards,
Andy

Your question "why" was, I believe answered quite fully by the history of the object and the changeset tags here. That's why I asked the question above.

May I ask what brought this edit and the others at @NinaNesterovaOSM/changeset_comments to your attention?

This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 162736067, 162736386, 162736504, 162736625, 162736843, 162737594, 162737644, 162795263, 162795676, 162795853, 162818469, 162819929.