Looking at e.g. https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/930968280 , what was the previous "prow:ref" ("326/4") likely to have been? It wasn't the same as "prow_ref" ("Radley FP 4")?
Was it perhaps some internal council GIS thing that doesn't belong in OSM?

Hello,
You are tagfiddling again :)
Previously I used to separate out plaques from plates - you can see that at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#18/-25.00904/135.17758 . Tag changes should be discussed in the forum, especially if there are data consumers who are going to be affected - something that you can see at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/memorial=plate#projects .
On an individual basis it's certainly possible to argue that "plaque" is the better tag - this one is https://www.iwm.org.uk/memorials/item/memorial/44738 , and I'd have mapped that as a plaque to start with, but mass changes should be discussed - something that you seem to have trouble doing: @geozeisig/blocks .
Best Regards,
Andy

@InsertUser - I'd suggest just tidying this up now, as this user hasn't been seen for a while.

Just in case you're not aware, this changeset was mentioned at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-get-an-importer-s-attention/110565/24 .

This was actually all York Community Woodland, and was a first survey of the tracks that are currently open. Much more to do (more paths, fences, trees, etc.)

Roosters have bought Daleside, and there were Daleside vans in Roosters' car park (southeast of node/11880910004 ) yesterday, so I'm not sure how much activity there is on this site now.

... although "Showground Ringway" IS used as a path name on some paths around here - needs further survey (which would be an excuse to sample the beer).

Interestingly https://www.facebook.com/100086442774117/posts/401927786031977 suggests "Italian Bridge" as an alt_name but also suggests "The New Tanuma Bridge" as the name...

Hello,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here. I'm looking at the changes to https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/727060307 here and it seems a bit odd. You've removed the official name, added a name:ar and name:en that match the name set a couple of changesets ago, but left bridge:name, bridge:name:ar and bridge:name:en set to slightly different things.
If the official name of the bridge isn't what you removed, what is it?
Best Regards, Andy

Hello,
What was the source of the name added here? It surely wasn't "Esri World Imagery"...

Best Regards,
Andy

Hello teegan ramiel and welcome to OpenStreetMap,
You've deleted quite a lot of data here over quite a wide area such as node/10682524206/history . Normally when something is mapped incorrectly people would change it to something more correct. Does that, and the other things that you have deleted definitely not exist as anything?
Best Regards,
Andy

Привіт oLexandr123,

Ім’я, яке ви дали way/106597036/history тут, явно не справжнє ім’я. Будь ласка, відображайте лише реальність.

З найкращими побажаннями,

Енді

Hello oLexandr123,

The name you gave to way/106597036/history here clearly was not the real name. Please only map reality.

Best Regards,

Andy

Bonjour,

Si des bâtiments comme way/1279179007 sont censés être rectangulaires, vous pouvez appuyer sur "q" dans l'éditeur après avoir ajouté le bâtiment pour le rendre rectangulaire.
Cordialement,
Andy

Hello,

If buildings like way/1279179007 are supposed to be rectangular you can press "q" in the editor after adding the building to make it rectangular.
Best Regards,
Andy

Sure - I'm guessing that the area has been tidied up a bit now that the bridge to the southeast is open again.

Thanks!

From survey 28/4/2024, ts0874b

15/4/2024, ts0850b

Привет,
way/1278075660 — это невероятно большое здание. Можете ли вы помочь нам, сказав, что вы пытаетесь добавить сюда?
С наилучшими пожеланиями,
Энди